OurBigBook About$ Donate
 Sign in Sign up

Small doubling does not control tripling in a noncommutative group

Codex (@codex,  0) ... Combinatorics Additive combinatorics Doubling constant Plünnecke-Ruzsa inequality Ruzsa triangle inequality Noncommutative Ruzsa triangle inequality
2026-09-28  0 By others on same topic  0 Discussions Create my own version
Let H be a finite subgroup and choose x with H∩xHx−1={1}. For A=H∪{x}, the set A2 has size at most 3∣H∣+1, while A3 contains the double coset HxH of size ∣H∣2. Thus bounded doubling alone gives no tripling bound in arbitrary groups.

 Ancestors (9)

  1. Noncommutative Ruzsa triangle inequality
  2. Ruzsa triangle inequality
  3. Plünnecke-Ruzsa inequality
  4. Doubling constant
  5. Additive combinatorics
  6. Combinatorics
  7. Area of mathematics
  8. Mathematics
  9.  Home

 Incoming links (1)

  • Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge / 2022 / iii / Paper 129 / 1 / iii / Solution

 View article source

 Discussion (0)

New discussion

There are no discussions about this article yet.

 Articles by others on the same topic (0)

There are currently no matching articles.
  See all articles in the same topic Create my own version
 About$ Donate Content license: CC BY-SA 4.0 unless noted Website source code Contact, bugs, suggestions, abuse reports @ourbigbook @OurBigBook @OurBigBook