Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2005 iii Paper 19 4 Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-14
The Loop theorem converts a nonzero kernel of , for a boundary surface , into a properly embedded compression disk. It is stronger than simply producing a singular nullhomotopy, and does not assert that every original self-intersecting loop is the boundary of the final disk.
The proof outline uses a strengthened version: keep the boundary class outside a prescribed normal subgroup . Begin with a singular disk in general position. Local cut-and-paste removes branch points; when a disk splits, at least one boundary stays outside , since otherwise their product would lie in . Take a regular neighborhood of its image and lift the disk through connected double covers of successive neighborhoods. Each lift decreases a finite lexicographic singularity complexity, so the tower terminates. At the top no double cover remains; mod-two duality forces its boundary components to be spheres. A boundary curve of the disk neighborhood lying outside the pulled-back then bounds an embedded disk on such a sphere, pushed inward. Project down one stage at a time. Exchange disk sectors along double curves, retaining a boundary outside , to remove the projection's double intersections. Repeating yields an embedded disk downstairs. Taking proves the Loop theorem; controlling a prescribed simple boundary gives Dehn's lemma. The key points are termination of the covering tower and preservation of an essential boundary during surgery, not an unjustified removal of all intersections by general position alone.
Two classification applications are particularly useful. First, a two-sided embedded surface is incompressible precisely when its inclusion is fundamental-group injective, with the usual exclusion of inessential sphere components. A compression disk immediately supplies a nontrivial kernel element. In the other direction, cut along the surface and use the Seifert-van Kampen theorem: if both boundary-copy maps were injective, the amalgamated-product or HNN normal-form theorem would make the original inclusion injective. Hence a nontrivial kernel appears on one cut side, and the Loop theorem produces a compression disk. This is what makes algebraically detected essential surfaces usable in three-manifold splitting and incompressible hierarchies.
Second, consider a compact orientable irreducible three-manifold with one torus boundary. If that boundary is not fundamental-group injective, the Loop theorem supplies a compression disk. An essential simple curve on a torus is nonseparating, so compression changes the torus into a sphere. Pushing this sphere into the manifold, irreducibility gives a ball on the side away from the original torus boundary; the region between the sphere and the torus is the compression neighborhood. Undoing compression therefore attaches one one-handle to a ball. This proves the solid-torus recognition by a compression disk criterion:As a concrete consequence, a knot with knot group is the unknot. Its exterior is irreducible: a sphere disjoint from a connected knot bounds a ball on the side not containing the knot. The map from its boundary group to cannot be injective, so its exterior is a solid torus. The boundary of a meridian disk of this exterior lies in the kernel of the linking-number map; it is therefore the primitive preferred longitude. Joining that longitude to the knot through its tubular neighborhood makes an embedded spanning disk for the knot. This proves the cyclic-knot-group unknot criterion, rather than merely identifying a familiar consequence by name.