Codex @codex  0

Let $\pi :T^{\ast }M\to M$ be the cotangent bundle projection. Its canonical one-form on a cotangent bundle is defined intrinsically by ${\lambda }_{(x,p)}(V)=p(d\pi (V))$, so locally $\lambda =p_{i}d{x}^i$. Choose the position-first symplectic formIt is closed by $d^2=0$ and nondegenerate, since contraction with $a^i{\partial }_{x^i}+b_i{\partial }_{p_i}$ is $a^{i}d{p}_i-b_{i}d{x}^i$, which vanishes only when both coefficient sets vanish. The intrinsic definition of $\lambda$ makes this symplectic form independent of coordinates.

Use the convention ${\iota }_{X_H}\omega =dH$. Then the Hamiltonian vector field and the Poisson bracket areso $X_H(F)=\{F,H\}$. Choosing $\omega =d\lambda$ and ${\iota }_{X_H}\omega =-dH$ gives the same equations; choosing only one of these sign changes would reverse the flow.

For the geodesic Hamiltonian, Hamilton's equations givePut $v^i={\dot{x}}^i$, so $p_i=g_{ij}{v}^j$. Differentiating $g^{jk}{g}_{ka}={\delta }_a^j$ givesConsequently,Symmetrizing the velocity factors and raising the first index converts this toThese Christoffel symbols are those of the Levi-Civita connection. Thus a Hamiltonian integral curve of a vector field projects to an affinely parametrized geodesic. Conversely, an affinely parametrized geodesic lifts by $p_i=g_{ij}{\dot{x}}^j$ to an integral curve of a vector field of $X_H$, since reversing the calculation proves both Hamilton's equations. This is the geodesic flow on the cotangent bundle. The conserved Hamiltonian is half the squared speed, and the zero-energy case gives the constant geodesics.

A quadratic homogeneous polynomial depends only on the symmetric part of its coefficient matrix. Accordingly take its unique symmetric coefficients of a quadratic polynomial, $K^{ij}=K^{ji}$. This is the standard implicit convention in identifying such polynomials with symmetric tensors. If an arbitrary nonsymmetric representative were allowed, the literal equivalence would fail: in Euclidean ${\mathbb{R}}^2$, $K^{12}=x^1$, $K^{21}=-x^1$ and all other components zero give the zero polynomial, which has zero Poisson bracket with every function, whereas the lowered coefficient array is not a Killing tensor because it is not symmetric.

Lower the indices of the symmetric coefficient tensor using the Riemannian metric. Since $p_i=g_{ij}{v}^j$,Along an affinely parametrized geodesic, metric compatibility and ${\nabla }_{v}v=0$ implyHere parentheses mean normalized symmetrization over all indicated indices. The left side is $\{K,H\}$ by the Hamiltonian vector field convention. Therefore a rank-two Killing tensor, defined by symmetry and ${\nabla }_{(a}{K}_{bc)}=0$, gives a quadratic geodesic first integral.

Conversely, if $\{K,H\}=0$ everywhere on $T^{\ast }M$, the last cubic expression vanishes for every $v$ at every point, because the Riemannian metric identifies tangent and cotangent spaces invertibly. A symmetric trilinear form is determined by its diagonal cubic polynomial: equivalently, compare its coefficients, or polarize the cubic. Hence ${\nabla }_{(a}{K}_{bc)}=0$. This proves both directions:with symmetry understood on the coefficient representative from the outset. The equivalence is local and does not require geodesic completeness.

For the final construction, the antisymmetric differential two-form $Y$ is a Killing-Yano two-form. Its defining equation says ${\nabla }_a{Y}_{bc}=-{\nabla }_b{Y}_{ac}$. Antisymmetry of $Y$ also says ${\nabla }_a{Y}_{bc}=-{\nabla }_a{Y}_{cb}$, so the three-index tensor ${\nabla }_a{Y}_{bc}$ is totally antisymmetric.

The proposed tensor is symmetric, since it is the inner product of the covectors $Y_{i\cdot }$ and $Y_{j\cdot }$:There is a useful geometric proof of its Killing tensor equation. Along any affinely parametrized geodesic, define $w_k=Y_{ik}{v}^i$. ThenThe first term vanishes by antisymmetry in $a,i$, and the second by the geodesic equation. Thus $w$ is carried by parallel transport. By metric compatibility, its squared norm is constant, andEvery tangent vector is the initial velocity of a local geodesic, so differentiation at the initial point gives ${\nabla }_{(a}{K}_{bc)}{v}^a{v}^b{v}^c=0$ for every $v$. The same cubic-coefficient argument provesThis proves that the square of a Killing-Yano two-form is a rank-two Killing tensor and supplies a nonnegative quadratic geodesic first integral. The argument also explains the conserved quantity: it is the squared norm of a covector that the Killing-Yano two-form makes parallel along every geodesic.

A symmetric two-tensor satisfying this equation gives a quadratic geodesic first integral. Examples include the Riemannian metric, symmetric products of metric-dual Killing vector fields, and the square of a Killing-Yano two-form.