For a plane domain, the following are equivalent descriptions of a simply connected domain: every based loop contracts in the domain with its basepoint fixed; any two paths with the same endpoints are homotopic while those endpoints stay fixed; its complement in the Riemann sphere is connected; every holomorphic function has a single-valued primitive; and every nowhere-zero holomorphic function has a holomorphic logarithm. The complement must be taken in the extended plane, including infinity. An equivalent winding number formulation is that every closed curve has index zero about every point outside the domain.
Here is a direct equivalence proof for the first two topological formulations. If all paths with given endpoints are homotopic relative to those endpoints, apply this to a loop based at and the constant path at , obtaining a contraction. Conversely, let join to . The loop contracts with basepoint fixed. Concatenating this contraction with produces a homotopy from to , relative to . The middle retracing excursion contracts by shortening its traversal in both directions, giving a homotopy from that first path to . Hence and are homotopic relative to their endpoints. Planar domains are path-connected, so no extra path-component condition is needed.
The analytic descriptions follow from path independence of the holomorphic integral. Local primitives exist on discs by integrating power series; a homotopy can be subdivided into pieces lying in such discs, and local path integrals cancel along its common edges. Thus integrals over homotopic paths agree, giving a global primitive. Applied to for a nowhere-zero function, a primitive makes constant and hence supplies a holomorphic logarithm. These observations are also the tools used in the mapping proof below.
The Riemann mapping theorem states that every nonempty simply connected proper domain admits a conformal bijection onto the unit disc. Given , there is exactly one such map with and . The exclusion of the whole plane is necessary: an entire map into the disc would be constant by Liouville's theorem.
An extremal proof has the following concrete steps. First construct an injective bounded holomorphic map. Choose and a holomorphic square root of . It is injective, since equality of its values implies equality of their squares. Its image is disjoint from its negative: would imply and then , impossible. If , choose with ; the disc is omitted. Therefore is injective and bounded. Scaling it and applying an automorphism of the unit disk gives a map into the disc taking to zero; a rotation makes its derivative positive.
Let consist of all injective maps with this normalization. It is nonempty. The derivative at is bounded above by the Cauchy integral formula on a small disc compactly contained in . Choose with derivatives tending to their positive supremum . Boundedness, the Cauchy estimates and a diagonal Arzelà-Ascoli theorem argument give a subsequence converging locally uniformly to ; this is the bounded-family form of the Montel theorem. Then , , and the maximum modulus principle puts its image in the open disc. The limit is injective: if distinct had , apply Hurwitz's theorem near to , which has no zero there; the limit would vanish identically, contradicting .
Finally suppose is omitted by . It is nonzero since . Let and choose a holomorphic square root of . It is injective and takes values in the disc. Put , so , and normalize by a rotation. The new map's derivative magnitude at is
This square-root improvement of a normalized conformal map contradicts extremality. Thus is onto. Two normalized bijections differ by a disc automorphism fixing zero; Schwarz lemma applied to it and its inverse makes it a rotation, and positivity of the normalized derivatives forces that rotation to be the identity. This completes the requested proof outline.
The Riemann mapping theorem asserts that a nonempty simply connected domain is biholomorphic to the unit disk . More precisely, for each there is a unique biholomorphism satisfying and . We prove existence through an extremal derivative, deriving the compactness and injectivity steps rather than assuming special lemmas for the theorem.
First construct a bounded univalent function on . Choose and a holomorphic logarithm of , which exists by the permitted logarithm result on the translated simply connected domain. Put
Then , so is univalent and never zero. Its image is open, and : equality would imply after squaring and then .
Fix and choose with . It follows that is disjoint from , so throughout . Hence
is a univalent function with . For , define
The identity
and the inverse show directly that is an automorphism of the unit disk. Apply to and then a rotation to make its nonzero derivative at positive. The family of univalent maps with value zero and positive derivative at is therefore nonempty.
Let
It is positive. Choose with . The Cauchy estimate gives for every , so is finite. Take a sequence with .
We now justify a locally uniform convergence subsequence. On any compact subset of , the bound and the Cauchy estimate on slightly larger interior disks give a uniform derivative bound. They therefore give equicontinuity. Apply the Arzelà-Ascoli theorem on a compact exhaustion of , then take a diagonal subsequence for locally uniform convergence. Its limit is holomorphic: pass to the limit in the Cauchy integral formula on every small interior circle. The same formula for derivatives gives
Thus is nonconstant. Initially , and the maximum modulus principle improves this to everywhere.
For completeness, the needed locally uniform limit of univalent functions argument is short. If and , the nonconstant holomorphic function has an isolated zero at . Choose a small closed disk around excluding , with no zero on its boundary. Uniform convergence there gives . The Rouche theorem then makes have a zero inside that disk for all sufficiently large . Its only possible zero, by injectivity of , is , outside the disk. This contradiction proves injectivity of . Therefore and attains the supremum .
It remains to prove surjectivity. Suppose is omitted by ; since , necessarily . The domain is simply connected, because both constituent maps are homeomorphisms onto their images, and it excludes zero. The permitted holomorphic logarithm gives a holomorphic square root
This maps into and is univalent, since equality of its values implies equality after squaring and hence equality of the original arguments. Write . Then and . Normalize again with and a rotation. Its derivative magnitude is
The strict inequality follows from . This square-root improvement of a normalized conformal map contradicts extremality. Thus . An injective holomorphic map has nonzero derivative and a holomorphic local inverse; these inverses agree, so the resulting bijection is biholomorphic. We have proved existence.
For uniqueness, two normalized maps give an automorphism of the unit disk fixing zero. Apply the Schwarz lemma, proved in the next part, to this automorphism and its inverse. Both inequalities force equality, so the equality case makes it a rotation. Its derivative at zero is the positive real number , forcing that rotation to be the identity. Therefore
The proper-domain hypothesis is necessary: a bounded entire holomorphic function has derivative at most on disks of arbitrarily large radius by the Cauchy estimate, and hence is constant. Conversely, a domain biholomorphic to the disk is simply connected because the map is a homeomorphism.