Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2013 iii Paper 52 4 Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-07
Let primes denote radial derivatives of the equilibrium and put . The linearized continuity, adiabatic pressure and Poisson equation areTake the time derivative of the Poisson equation and substitute continuity. Integration in radius givesCentre regularity excludes a changing point mass at the origin, so andThe perturbed self-gravity must be retained; this calculation does not make the Cowling approximation.
The radial linear momentum equation is . Differentiate it in time and use the preceding equations:The equilibrium has and . The remaining terms simplify asConsequently the radial stellar oscillation equation isThe derivative acts on the full variable coefficient ; discarding would change the result.
For , . Substitute and multiply by . Combining the two terms proportional to into a total derivative gives the radial stellar pulsation equation,
Set , and . The Sturm-Liouville operator isFor regular physical perturbations, is finite at the centre and at the free surface. For a nonzero-frequency mode the fluid displacement is , so vanishing Lagrangian pressure perturbation is equivalent to . With and finite , this gives . Zero-frequency modes use the same displacement boundary condition directly. Assume bounded , positive in the interior and the usual finite-energy endpoint domain. Integration by parts givesThus this physical self-adjoint differential operator has real eigenvalues . The endpoint domain is essential: the fact that vanishes does not by itself allow arbitrary singular trial functions. The regular free-surface realization of the Sturm-Liouville problem is the one used here.
The Rayleigh-Ritz variational principle gives the fundamental squared frequency as the infimum of the weighted stellar pulsation Rayleigh quotient,The infimum is over admissible finite-energy functions satisfying the physical endpoint conditions. If this quotient is nonnegative for every such function, all radial frequencies are real and there is no exponentially growing radial mode. A negative value for even one trial function proves a negative eigenvalue and an exponentially growing solution, because . A zero lowest value is marginal and needs separate treatment of neutral motion.
Choose the homologous trial function , which corresponds to radial velocity proportional to . Its gradient contribution is zero, andThe denominator is positive. HenceThis pressure-weighted radial instability criterion is sufficient, not necessary: another trial function can detect instability even if this one does not. For a constant stellar adiabatic exponent it recovers instability below . At constant , the homologous mode is neutral. For constant , in a normally stratified hydrostatic equilibrium, so the quotient is positive and the star is radially stable.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2013 iii Paper 63 3 3 Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-07
The appropriate bounded-operator formulation uses the zero-boundary Sobolev spaceThe Poincare inequality makes this a Hilbert space norm equivalent to the usual norm, and the zero endpoint traces encode the Dirichlet boundary conditions. Under the usual regular-coefficient assumptions, for example continuous on the closed interval with and , setIf , then Cauchy-Schwarz inequality and the Poincare inequality giveBy the Riesz representation theorem, a unique bounded linear operator satisfies . Symmetry of makes self-adjoint, and the lower bound makes it elliptic and uniformly positive definite. The differential expression in the question is represented weakly by : for smooth functions, integration by parts giveswith the boundary term zero. A forcing becomes the bounded functional , or its Riesz representative in .
Equivalently, for sufficiently smooth coefficients one may realize the differential operator itself on with domain . Its regular Sturm-Liouville operator realization is self-adjoint andThis realization is an unbounded operator, so it should not be confused with the bounded weak operator used above.
The PDF states sign conditions without coefficient regularity. If only almost everywhere and are bounded, the same form is still bounded and strictly positive: a zero energy would force almost everywhere and the zero traces force . Uniform ellipticity, however, requires a positive lower bound. For instance for , , and satisfy literal pointwise positivity. Derivatives of unit norm supported in and of integral zero define functions in , with energy at most . Thus pointwise positivity without regularity does not imply coercivity in this norm. These distinctions supply the precise regularity and operator domain behind the intended positive-definiteness proof.