We give a finite chaining argument, keeping the constants explicit. If , the metric space has just the point and both sides vanish. Suppose , and write
Choose a smallest metric net of radius , and maps satisfying . Set and . Since is finite, choose with smaller than the minimum distance between distinct points; then and .
For each , retain only the pairs actually occurring along these approximation paths:
The triangle inequality gives for ; for the same argument uses . Also
Here only monotonicity in the radius for the same space is used. No monotonicity under subsets is assumed.
For every pair in , the increment has the Sub-Gamma random variable in the right tail bound with common parameters and : for ,
Identical pairs give the zero increment, which obeys the same bound. Both orientations have finite exponential moments, so all increments are integrable random variables. Differentiating their two upper bounds at zero also gives . Applying the maximum bound from part (b), including its case, gives
The telescoping sum along each path is exact:
Take the supremum, bound it by the sum of the maxima, and take expected values. This proves
For either or , the function is nonnegative and nonincreasing. Thus
Combining the estimates yields the required metric entropy bound:
In particular, and work. The square-root and linear metric entropy terms arise respectively from the two terms in the sub-Gamma maximum bound. Because the chain ends exactly at , no limiting sample-path regularity assumption is needed.
A centered random variable is sub-Gaussian with parameter when
For , the Chernoff bound gives
Minimizing at yields . Applying the same argument to proves the left-tail bound.
The moment-generating-function inequality and its version at imply
Comparing the second-order terms as gives . Since ,
A centered is Sub-Gamma random variable in the right tail with variance factor and scale factor when
The corresponding Bernstein's inequality is
A standard squared-sub-Gaussian lemma, obtained by integrating the sub-Gaussian tail or expanding exponential moments, states that
Scaling a sub-Gamma variable by multiplies its variance factor by and its scale by ; independent sums add variance factors and take the largest scale. Decompose
Their sum is therefore sub-Gamma on the right with variance factor
and scale factor
Apply Bernstein to the sum at threshold to obtain
Because the moment-generating function is finite in a neighborhood to the right of zero and , its cumulant-generating function satisfies
Divide the defining Sub-Gamma random variable in the right tail inequality by and let . The right side converges to , proving .
A centered random variable is a Sub-Gamma random variable in the right tail with variance factor and scale parameter when
The Chernoff bound with gives
If , the exponent is at least ; if , it is at least . Hence
Bernstein's inequality states that if are independent, centered, almost surely, and , then
For , the elementary exponential-series bound gives
For this follows from , and for it follows by bounding the higher powers using . Taking expectations, using , and then independence yields
Thus the sum is sub-Gamma with parameters , and the preceding Chernoff calculation proves Bernstein's inequality.
For the empirical distribution function, set and
Then , , and
The inverted Bernstein bound gives, with probability at least ,
Since and , this implies the stated bound.
For a centered random variable , being sub-Poisson in the right tail with variance parameter means
It is sub-Gamma in the right tail with variance parameter and scale parameter when
For , . Hence, for ,
Substitution into the defining moment-generating function bound shows that is sub-Gamma in the right tail with variance parameter and scale parameter .
Fix . Since is centered, the elementary inequality gives
On , use for ; on , expand the exponential function into its power series. The hypotheses therefore give
This is precisely the Sub-Gamma random variable in the right tail bound with variance parameter and scale parameter .
Write and . The variables and need not be independent random variables. Part (d) and the Cauchy-Schwarz inequality imply, for every integer ,
Also by Cauchy-Schwarz, because and . Thus , and, for ,
Part (c) shows that is sub-Gamma in the right tail with variance parameter and scale parameter .
If , then . Consequently
while . Another application of part (c) gives the improved variance parameter and scale parameter .