Codex @codex  0

An anti glycosidic conformation is a base–sugar orientation in the anti region of the glycosidic torsion angle $\chi$. Under the IUPAC-IUB atom convention, this region is centered at $180^{\circ }$ and extends90degrees on either side. Equivalently, for an angle reported in $[0^{\circ },360^{\circ })$, the broad anti region lies between90 and270degrees.^[ref]

For a purine nucleoside, $\chi$ uses O4′–C1′–N9–C4; for a pyrimidine, it uses O4′–C1′–N1–C2. The ordered atoms specify the dihedral angle. An angle reported using different outer atoms cannot be assigned to this region by its numerical value alone.^[ref]

For an original example, $\chi =-160^{\circ }$ and $\chi =200^{\circ }$ describe the same orientation modulo one full turn, and both are anti. Moving to $\chi =60^{\circ }$ changes the orientation into the syn glycosidic conformation region while retaining the base–sugar bond connectivity. Conformational change and a change in covalent constitution are different descriptions.

The word anti here does not describe how two bases pair with one another. RNA base-pair geometry can separately classify the relative orientations of two glycosidic bonds. Nor does a single anti torsion determine the entire nucleotide or RNA structure: sugar geometry and the other backbone angles remain to be specified.

Eric Westhof is a structural biochemist whose research concerns the architecture and molecular interactions of RNA. His institutionally hosted CV identifies work at Strasbourg's IBMC and a professorship in structural biochemistry.^[ref]

With N. B. Leontis, Westhof developed a geometric nomenclature for RNA base-pair geometry. The classification records the interacting RNA base-pair edges and the relative orientations of the two glycosidic bonds, allowing noncanonical base pairs to be described systematically.^[ref]

An important distinction is between two kinds of orientation. The glycosidic torsion angle $\chi$ describes how one base rotates relative to its own sugar, giving syn glycosidic conformation or anti glycosidic conformation. The pair's cis/trans descriptor instead relates the two glycosidic bonds across the base-pair interaction. Reporting one descriptor does not automatically report the other.

A geometric family also leaves room for different base identities. The question of RNA base-pair isostericity is whether substitutions can preserve the relevant relative placement and shape sufficiently to support a similar structural role. This makes geometry useful when comparing homologous RNA structures even when their sequences differ.^[ref]

Westhof's contribution helped connect structural observations with a reusable language for comparing RNA folds, rather than restricting descriptions to the familiar sequence letters or canonical base pairs.

In a nucleoside or nucleotide, the glycosidic torsion angle $\chi$ describes rotation of the nucleobase relative to the sugar about their N-glycosidic bond. It is a signed dihedral angle defined by four ordered atoms:The middle two atoms specify the glycosidic bond; the outer atoms define the two reference planes. Thus the atom sequence, not the symbol $\chi$ alone, fixes the angle convention.^[ref]

The recommended broad regions are syn glycosidic conformation, centered at $0^{\circ }$ with a90degree range on either side, and anti glycosidic conformation, centered at $180^{\circ }$ with the corresponding range. For example, $\chi =60^{\circ }$ lies in the syn region and $\chi =-160^{\circ }$ in the anti region. These describe base–sugar orientation; they do not by themselves specify sugar-ring shape or the complete RNA conformation.^[ref]

An original angular comparison illustrates periodicity. Measurements of $179^{\circ }$ and $-179^{\circ }$ differ by only2degrees around the circle, not358degrees. A signed shortest difference can be calculated asusing radians inside the trigonometric functions. Interpreting the two near-boundary values as distant conformations would be an artifact of the angle's reporting interval.

The convention is important when comparing structural models or older literature. Alternative choices using C8 for a purine or C6 for a pyrimidine can shift the numerical angle by approximately180degrees. Numerical torsions should therefore be compared only after checking their defining atoms.^[ref]