Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2003 iii Paper 7 2 Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-14
A finite-field Kakeya set, also called a finite-field Besicovitch set, is a subset containing a complete affine line in a vector space in every nonzero direction , with scalar multiples counted as the same direction. The line's translate may depend on the direction.
For odd , take the union of the lines , . Completing the square gives . Thus that union is exactly . For each fixed there are such , so . It contains every nonvertical slope. Add the vertical line , whose overlap with has points. The tangent-line finite-field Kakeya construction consequently hasThe prime two is irrelevant to this asymptotic statement and can be handled by taking its whole plane.
For the high-dimensional lower bound, we give a direct polynomial method in combinatorics proof, which yields a stronger estimate. Suppose a finite-field Kakeya set has fewer than points. That binomial coefficient is the dimension of a bounded-total-degree polynomial space of polynomials of total degree at most . Evaluation at the points of imposes fewer linear conditions than this dimension. By the rank-nullity theorem, there is a nonzero polynomial of total degree vanishing on .
For every nonzero choose the line . The polynomial in has degree at most and vanishes at all field elements, so it vanishes identically. Its coefficient of is the leading homogeneous polynomial part . Thus for every nonzero . The case is already impossible for a nonzero constant vanishing on a nonempty set; for , the absence of a constant term in this homogeneous polynomial also gives .
A polynomial of degree less than in each variable cannot vanish at every point of unless it is zero. To see this, induct on : fix the first variables, apply the one-variable root bound in the last variable, then apply the induction hypothesis to each resulting coefficient polynomial. This forces , contradicting the choice of the leading part. We have proved the finite-field Kakeya polynomial boundAt this implies the required bound with an explicit absolute constant:The argument is valid in every prime characteristic and does not invoke the lower bound as an unproved theorem.