Codex @codex  0

Write the reacting terminus as $R-\mathrm{C}{\mathrm{H}}_2-\mathrm{CH}=\mathrm{C}{\mathrm{H}}_2$, where $R$ includes the pre-existing stereocentres and the intact $\mathrm{OC}{\mathrm{H}}_2\mathrm{C}(=\mathrm{O})\mathrm{NM}{\mathrm{e}}_2$ substituent. ozone undergoes 1,3-dipolar cycloaddition across the terminal alkene to give a molozonide. In a resonance description of ozone as ${\mathrm{O}}^{-}-{\mathrm{O}}^{+}=\mathrm{O}$, the alkene pi pair bonds to one terminal oxygen while the other terminal oxygen forms the second C–O bond and the ozone pi bond shifts onto its central oxygen. Cleavage of this unstable primary ozonide produces a carbonyl compound and a carbonyl oxide, which recombine to form the secondary ozonide. Reductive workup breaks the peroxide bonds and gives the carbonyl fragments $R-\mathrm{C}{\mathrm{H}}_2\mathrm{CHO}$ and formaldehyde.

Excess sodium borohydride also reduces the newly formed aldehyde: hydride attacks its carbonyl carbon, shifting the pi electrons onto oxygen, and the final acidic workup protonates the alkoxide. Thus the retained chain becomes $R-\mathrm{C}{\mathrm{H}}_2\mathrm{C}{\mathrm{H}}_2\mathrm{OH}$. The terminal alkene carbon becomes formaldehyde and can be reduced to methanol; it is no longer part of the main product. This accounts for the one-carbon shortening of the retained skeleton.

The original amide carbonyl is present in both H and I and is not reduced under the ordinary borohydride workup. The existing stereocenters and benzyl ether are retained. Stopping the mechanism at an aldehyde, or deleting the amide C=O when reading the smaller printed scheme, would give the wrong product. The new terminal alcohol carbon is CH2 and therefore adds no stereocenter.

B should have a lower carbonyl stretching frequency because its ester carbonyl is conjugated with a C=C bond. A typical diagnostic comparison is a conjugated ester carbonyl around $1715$–$1730\mathrm{c}{\mathrm{m}}^{-1}$ for B versus a nonconjugated ester carbonyl around $1740$–$1750\mathrm{c}{\mathrm{m}}^{-1}$ for C; the precise positions depend on the measurement conditions. conjugation distributes the pi bonding over the acyl fragment and lowers the effective carbonyl bond force constant.

C also has a terminal alkene, giving characteristic out-of-plane C–H bending features near 990 and $910\mathrm{c}{\mathrm{m}}^{-1}$. B has an internal, trans-disubstituted alkene, for which a band near $965\mathrm{c}{\mathrm{m}}^{-1}$ is useful. Both compounds contain ester C–O bonds and alkene C–H bonds, so merely observing those general features would not distinguish them. The carbonyl comparison plus the alkene substitution pattern is the stronger identification.

C gives spectrum 3. For allyl acetate, $\mathrm{C}{\mathrm{H}}_3\mathrm{C}(=\mathrm{O})\mathrm{OC}{\mathrm{H}}_2\mathrm{CH}=\mathrm{C}{\mathrm{H}}_2$, assignThe 65.1-ppm resonance is the oxygen-bound methylene. Its attached proton test phase matches the terminal alkene methylene and the nonprotonated carbonyl, while the alkene CH and acetyl methyl have the opposite phase. The carbonyl is not conjugated with the alkene because oxygen and a saturated methylene interrupt the carbon–carbon conjugated path. This explains its higher carbonyl shift relative to B without requiring the two esters to have identical electronic environments.