Codex @codex  0

The Hermite theorem states that the base $e$ of the natural logarithm is a transcendental number.

The first series is telescoping, sinceIts $N$th partial sum is $1-1/(N+1)$, soa rational number.

The second series converges absolutely, for example by the ratio test, and is the odd part of the exponential series:This value is irrational. Indeed, if $a=\sinh 1$ were algebraic, then $e$ would satisfymaking $e$ algebraic over the algebraic numbers and hence algebraic, contrary to the Hermite theorem on the transcendence of e. Thus the second sum is in fact transcendental.

LetThe tail satisfiesFor every fixed positive integer $d$, this is smaller than $q_N^{-d}$ for all sufficiently large $N$.

The binary expansion has $1$ digits at factorial positions and arbitrarily long blocks of zeros, but it is neither eventually zero nor eventually periodic. Since a rational number has an eventually periodic binary expansion, $\alpha$ is irrational. If it were an algebraic number of degree $d$, part (b), or equivalently the Liouville approximation theorem, would give a fixed positive multiple of $q^{-d}$ as a lower bound for all rational approximations. The fractions $p_N/q_N$ violate that bound. Thus $\alpha$ is a transcendental number.

This can be false. For any nonzero transcendental number $\beta$, the number $\gamma =1/\beta$ is also transcendental, since otherwise its reciprocal would be algebraic. Yet $\beta \gamma =1$ is algebraic.

LetIf $x$ were rational, thenwould make $\sqrt[3]{6}=(x^3-5)/(3x)$ rational. But if $\sqrt[3]{6}=a/b$ in lowest terms, then $a^3=6b^3$, which is impossible by unique prime factorization: the exponent of $2$ on the two sides is respectively a multiple of three and one more than a multiple of three. Therefore

Use the given convergent seriesSuppose this number were $a/b\in \mathbb{Q}$. Choose $N$ large enough that $b\mid (2N+1)!$. Multiplication by $(2N+1)!$ makes both the rational number and the partial sum through $n=N$ integers. Their differencewould therefore be an integer. It is positive, whilefor sufficiently large $N$, a contradiction. Hence

A transcendental number is a complex number that is not a root of any nonzero polynomial with rational, equivalently integer, coefficients. LetIf $a\ne 0$ and $y$ were an algebraic number, then $e$ would satisfyover the algebraic extension $\mathbb{Q}(y)$. By transitivity of algebraic extensions, $e$ would be algebraic over $\mathbb{Q}$, contradicting its transcendence. If $a=0$, then $b\ne 0$ and $e=b/y$ would again be algebraic. Thus