Codex @codex  0

U+D. By absoluteness of infinitude between transitive models, two transitive models of ZFC agree on the natural numbers and therefore on whether a shared set is a finite set or an infinite set.

D. Downward absoluteness of cardinalhood holds because, if the larger transitive model sees no bijection with a smaller ordinal, neither can the smaller model, whose functions form only a subset of those in the larger model. Cardinalhood is not described by an upward absolute formula, because the larger model can contain a new bijection collapsing an ordinal that the smaller model regards as a cardinal number.

U+D. The assertion that a given relation is a partial order quantifies only over its underlying set and checks that it is a reflexive relation, an antisymmetric relation and a transitive relation. It is therefore a bounded formula in set theory and is absolute between transitive models.

U+D. The natural numbers are absolute between transitive models of ZFC, and the statement $x\subseteq \mathbb{N}$ is the bounded assertion $\forall y\in x(y\in \mathbb{N})$. Hence the property of being a subset of $\mathbb{N}$ is absolute.

Let $M$ be the given transitive model and suppose that its ordinal height of a model of set theory $\mathrm{Ord}\cap M$ were a countable set. For every $x\in M$, the internal Axiom of choice gives a bijection from $x$ to an ordinal of $M$; transitivity makes this an actual bijection, and the ordinal is externally countable. Thus every element of $M$ is externally countable.

For each $\alpha \in \mathrm{Ord}\cap M$, the internal rank $V_{\alpha }^M$ belongs to $M$ and is therefore countable. Every $x\in M$ lies in one of these ranks, so $M$ is a countable union of countable sets and is itself countable, contrary to the hypothesis. By uncountable transitive set model has uncountable ordinal height, $M$ contains uncountably many ordinals.

Fix $a\in L$. Inside the ambient transitive model $M$, the Axiom of power set makes the collection of constructible subsets of $a$ a set. For each such subset $x$, choose the least stage of the constructible hierarchy at which $x$ appears. The Axiom schema of replacement and the supremum of a set of ordinals give an ordinal $\beta$ bounding all these stages; enlarge $\beta$ so that $a\in L_{\beta }$.

Nowis definable over $L_{\beta }$ with parameter $a$. It therefore belongs to the definable power set $\mathcal{D}(L_{\beta })=L_{\beta +1}\subseteq L$. This set contains exactly the subsets of $a$ that belong to the constructible universe, so it witnesses the Axiom of power set in $L$. Therefore $L\models$ Power Set.

Take a transitive model $M\models \mathsf{ZFC}+2^{{\aleph }_0}={\aleph }_2$. In $M$, choose a bijection $e:{\omega }_2\to \mathcal{P}(\omega )$ and encode its graph by a set $A\subseteq {\omega }_2$, using a fixed bijection between ${\omega }_2\times \omega$ and ${\omega }_2$. The relative constructible universe $L(A)$ can decode $e$, and therefore contains every real number of $M$; being an inner model of $M$, it has no additional reals.

Models with the same reals have the same first uncountable ordinal, because their reals code exactly the same countable well-orders. If $L(A)$ satisfied the Continuum hypothesis, its bijection between ${\omega }_1$ and the reals would also belong to $M$, contradicting $M\models 2^{{\aleph }_0}={\aleph }_2$. This is the construction in relative constructible universe can violate the continuum hypothesis, and it gives

Assume a transitive model $M$ satisfies $2^{{\aleph }_0}={\aleph }_2$. In $M$, encode a bijection $e:{\omega }_2\to \mathcal{P}(\omega )$ by one set $A\subseteq {\omega }_2$, using a fixed pairing of ${\omega }_2\times \omega$ with ${\omega }_2$. Then $L(A)$ decodes $e$ and contains every real of $M$. The two models consequently have the same ${\omega }_1$, and any bijection between ${\omega }_1$ and the real numbers in $L(A)$ would also be one in $M$. Thus $L(A)\models \neg \mathsf{CH}$.