The exponent-two Erdős-Rado theorem for pairs says that for every infinite cardinal ,
In particular, a finite or countable coloring of pairs from has an uncountable monochromatic subset. We prove the general statement by an end-homogeneous tree construction.
Let be any coloring on an ordinal . Route a vertex through an increasing sequence of preceding vertices as follows. Start with the least vertex. After ancestors , , have been selected, choose the least remaining candidate , above those ancestors, satisfying
The terminal candidate always qualifies, so the procedure eventually reaches it. Candidate sets shrink and their least elements increase. If an intermediate candidate is , its route is precisely the earlier part of the route to , because all earlier color tests agree. Consequently the routes define a set-theoretic tree on the vertices.
Along a branch, the color from an ancestor to every later branch vertex is constant. Also a node of height is determined by its sequence of colors to its ancestors: reconstruct the ancestors as successive least candidates with those prescribed colors, then reconstruct the node as the least final candidate. Thus its level has at most nodes.
Apply this with and . If every node had height less than , each level would have size at most , and there would be at most such levels. Their total size would be at most , contradicting . Hence some route has at least ancestors. For each ancestor mark its constant color to all later route points. Since there are only colors, one occurs on ancestors. Those ancestors form the required monochromatic set. This proves the theorem.
To make the ordinal function precise, one useful ordinal partition-bound function is
The target here is ordinal order type. For infinite , the proved theorem with supplies a bound : its homogeneous set has order type at least , and it handles all the required color counts. Finite targets are handled by finite Ramsey theorem bounds. Thus is total, nondecreasing and .
Suppose a sequence of transfinite iterates , with suprema at limit stages, has supremum an uncountable cardinal at a limit stage, with every earlier iterate below . Then
choose an earlier iterate at least and use the next one as a bound. If the iteration has already stabilized, it has already found a fixed point instead.
This closure forces to be a strong limit cardinal. For any infinite , color pairs of distinct binary strings of length by their first differing coordinate. This uses colors and has no monochromatic triangle: three binary digits at one coordinate cannot be pairwise different. It gives a coloring on with no homogeneous target of type . Since colors are allowed when the target is the ordinal , we have
Finite exponents satisfy the strong-limit requirement automatically for uncountable .
The needed additional condition is the tree property: every tree of height , with nonempty levels of size less than , has a cofinal branch. In the present convention it forces to be a regular cardinal. If were singular, take a cofinal sequence of smaller cardinals of length and form the disjoint union of chains of those lengths. This tree has height and total size , levels of size at most , but no branch of length , a contradiction.
For any , apply the preceding color-routing tree to a coloring . If a route already has length , use it. Otherwise its levels are indexed below and each has size
for infinite exponents, by the strong-limit property; finite cases satisfy the same needed bound directly. The tree has nodes, so regularity forces its height to be . The tree property supplies a cofinal branch. The ancestor-color partition of that branch has one class of size , since and is regular. Thus for every , and
We have proved that an uncountable function-closed cardinal with the tree property is regular and strong limit, hence strongly inaccessible, and that it is the requested fixed point.
The paper's final sentence, read as a claim about the tree property alone, is false. Already has it by the König infinity lemma but is not uncountable; even with uncountability stipulated, there are relative-consistency models with the tree property at . The latter counterexample is documented in the research account of Mitchell forcing. The rigorous conclusion in the iterated-function context is the one just proved: function closure supplies strong limit, and the tree property supplies regularity and a branch. Strong limit and regularity follow from distinct hypotheses in this context.