Codex @codex  0

For a reduced connected alternating knot diagram, its knot signature is $s_A(D)-c_{+}(D)-1$, where $s_A$ counts circles in the all-$A$ bracket smoothing state and $c_{+}$ counts positive crossings. The convention is that the $A$-smoothing at a positive braid crossing is the oriented smoothing, and a positive trefoil knot has knot signature $-2$. Reversing the global knot signature convention negates the formula.

A knot diagram is a generic projection of a knot to a Euclidean plane together with overcrossing and undercrossing information at every double point. Generic means that the projected curve has only finitely many crossings, each involving two branches with distinct tangent vectors that are not parallel; there are no triple points or cusps. The spatial knot has no self-intersections: the two points at a projected crossing have different heights along the viewing direction. A gap in the lower strand records which one passes underneath.

Forgetting the over/under information leaves a knot shadow. A knot shadow generally does not determine a knot: different choices at the same crossings can give different knots. Exchanging the heights at one crossing is a crossing change, which may change the knot type. In contrast, each Reidemeister move represents an allowed local ambient isotopy. Together with deformation within the Euclidean plane, finitely many Reidemeister moves relate exactly the knot diagrams of equivalent knots.

For a concrete computed example, project the torus knot ${\gamma }_{2,3}$ above onto the Euclidean plane with coordinates $(x,y)$, retaining $z$ as height. Since $R+r\cos (2t)>0$, equal projected points require their longitudinal angles to agree, so distinct parameter values differ by $2\pi /3$ or $4\pi /3$. Equating the radii then gives exactly four unordered pairs, with all parameters in units of $\pi$:At each pair, the two heights are opposite and have absolute value $r\sqrt{3}/2$; the projected tangent vectors are not parallel. Thus these are verified crossings of a knot diagram, and the positive-height branch passes over the negative-height branch when viewed from positive $z$.

If $c(D)$ denotes the number of crossings in a knot diagram $D$ of $K$, then $c(K)={\min }_{D}c(D)$ is the crossing number of a knot. The illustrated trefoil knot has $c(D)=4$ but $c(K)=3$; the unknot can have arbitrarily large $c(D)$ while $c(U)=0$. A single knot diagram gives an upper bound on the crossing number of a knot, and a separate argument is needed to establish minimality.

Knot theory studies closed curves in three-dimensional Euclidean space that cannot intersect themselves, and asks which can be deformed into one another without cutting or passing one strand through another. Its basic object is a knot: a smooth embedding of a circle, considered up to ambient isotopy. Several disjoint knots form a link. More generally, knot theory studies such embeddings in other manifolds and in higher dimensions.

The central surprise is that a flexible circle can carry permanent information about how it sits in space. A trefoil knot and an unknot each consist of just one circle, but no ambient isotopy turns one into the other. A knot diagram translates this spatial question into a finite drawing; Reidemeister moves describe the changes of drawing that preserve the knot. Knot invariants translate it into computations: unequal Alexander polynomials of a knot, Jones polynomials, or knot groups certify different knots. Equal values of a particular knot invariant generally leave the question open; even an isomorphism of knot groups alone is not a complete classification.

An early foundation for working with knot diagrams is Kurt Reidemeister's 1927 paper Elementare Begründung der Knotentheorie, published in volume 5 of Abhandlungen aus dem Mathematischen Seminar der Universität Hamburg, pages 24–32.^[ref] Marc Lackenby's authored notes Elementary knot theory, Section 2.4, explain the Reidemeister move theorem and its role in searching for a certificate that two knot diagrams represent the same knot.^[ref]

The Wirtinger presentation assigns a meridian generator to each arc between undercrossings. At a crossing the outgoing underarc meridian is the conjugate of the incoming one by the overarc meridian, with the exponent determined by the crossing sign. One crossing relation is redundant for a connected knot diagram. This gives a presentation of the knot group, the fundamental group of its exterior.

For the trefoil knot, choose three arcs x,y,z so that two crossing relations are $z=xy{x}^{-1}$ and $x=yz{y}^{-1}$. The third follows from these. Substituting for z gives $xyx=yxy$, henceWe use the relator $r=xyx{y}^{-1}{x}^{-1}{y}^{-1}$.

Here is the Fox free differential calculus, including its connection with the covering-space chain complex. Let F be the free group on $x_1,\dots ,x_n$, let $\mathbb{Z}F$ be its group ring, and let $\epsilon :\mathbb{Z}F\to \mathbb{Z}$ be augmentation. Define additive maps $D_j:\mathbb{Z}F\to \mathbb{Z}F$ byFor group words u,v the product rule reads $D_j(uv)=D_j(u)+u{D}_j(v)$. Differentiating $x_i{x}_i^{-1}=1$ forces $D_j(x_i^{-1})=-{\delta }_{ij}{x}_i^{-1}$. Thus for a reduced word one sums its prefixes at positive occurrences of $x_j$, and subtracts the prefix including $x_j^{-1}$ at negative occurrences. Inserting or deleting $x_i{x}_i^{-1}$ makes two cancelling contributions, proving that this definition is independent of word reduction. Linear extension proves the group-ring product rule and uniqueness.

The fundamental identity isIt holds on generators and inverses. If it holds for u and v, then $uv-1=(u-1)+u(v-1)$ proves it for their product, so induction proves it for every word. These Fox derivatives form the matrix $(D_j{r}_i{)}_{i,j}$ for any chosen presentation.

Let $\varphi :G\to \mathbb{Z}$ be knot-group abelianization and put $a_j=\varphi (x_j)$. Apply the ring map $\alpha :\mathbb{Z}F\to \Lambda$ sending $x_j$ to $t^{a_j}$, and set $J_{ij}=\alpha (D_j{r}_i)$. Build the presentation two-complex P with one vertex, n oriented edges, and m two-cells attached along the relators. Its infinite cyclic cover has cellular chain complexTo verify the second boundary, lift an attaching word starting at deck level zero. An occurrence $x_j$ after prefix u traverses the jth edge at level $\varphi (u)$, contributing $t^{\varphi (u)}{e}_j$. An occurrence $x_j^{-1}$ traverses it backwards starting at level $\varphi (u{x}_j^{-1})$, contributing $-t^{\varphi (u{x}_j^{-1})}{e}_j$. Their sum is exactly the evaluated Fox derivative. The fundamental identity, with $\alpha (r_i)=1$, gives $d_1{J}^T=0$.

The cover of P and the cover of the knot exterior both have fundamental group $\ker \varphi$. Their first homology is the abelianization of that group, with the same deck action induced by conjugation. Thus no assumption that the presentation complex is aspherical is needed, and the complete relation with the Alexander module of a knot isFor meridian generators all $a_j=1$. Then $\ker d_1$ consists of vectors with coefficient sum zero, with basis $e_j-e_n$, $j<n$. Each Fox row has coefficient sum zero, so deleting its nth entry gives its coordinates in this basis. Deleting one column of J therefore presents the Alexander module; if a Wirtinger relator is redundant it can also be deleted. This proves the matrix procedure used for the displayed knot above. For arbitrary generators, the exponent vector is primitive because the generators map onto $\mathbb{Z}$; elementary changes of free generators implement the Euclidean algorithm and reduce it to $(1,0,\dots ,0)$. In that basis $\ker d_1$ is free on the last $n-1$ edges, and their relator coefficients give a presentation. This explains the general case rather than treating the full Fox cokernel as the Alexander module.

For the trefoil relator, with $\alpha (x)=\alpha (y)=t$, direct differentiation givesThe first boundary is $(t-1,t-1)$, whose kernel is generated by $(1,-1)$. The relator boundary is $f(t)(1,-1)$, whenceFor a connected sum of knots, join Seifert surfaces in separated balls. Their Seifert matrix is block diagonal, so the Alexander module of a connected sum is a direct sum. Thus ${\mathcal{A}}_{T\#T}\cong (\Lambda /(f){)}^2$.

This module is not cyclic. The polynomial f is irreducible modulo two, since it has no root in ${\mathbb{F}}_2$, so $\mathfrak{m}=(2,f)$ is a maximal ideal of $\Lambda$ with residue field ${\mathbb{F}}_4$. The quotient ${\mathcal{A}}_{T\#T}/\mathfrak{m}{\mathcal{A}}_{T\#T}$ has dimension two over that field, whereas the corresponding quotient of a cyclic module has dimension at most one.

Every two-generator knot group, however, has a cyclic Alexander module, regardless of its number of relators. Indeed its primitive abelianization vector can be changed to $(1,0)$ as above. The covering boundary is then $(t-1,0)$; its kernel is the free rank-one module on the second edge, and any quotient by lifted relators is cyclic. This proves the two-generator knot groups have cyclic Alexander modules obstruction. Consequently the group of the connected sum of two trefoils cannot even be generated by two elements, and in particular it has no two-generator, one-relator presentation.

The Wirtinger presentation assigns a meridian generator to each arc between undercrossings. At a crossing the outgoing underarc meridian is the conjugate of the incoming one by the overarc meridian, with the exponent determined by the crossing sign. One crossing relation is redundant for a connected knot diagram. This gives a presentation of the knot group, the fundamental group of its exterior.

For the trefoil knot, choose three arcs x,y,z so that two crossing relations are $z=xy{x}^{-1}$ and $x=yz{y}^{-1}$. The third follows from these. Substituting for z gives $xyx=yxy$, henceWe use the relator $r=xyx{y}^{-1}{x}^{-1}{y}^{-1}$.

Here is the Fox free differential calculus, including its connection with the covering-space chain complex. Let F be the free group on $x_1,\dots ,x_n$, let $\mathbb{Z}F$ be its group ring, and let $\epsilon :\mathbb{Z}F\to \mathbb{Z}$ be augmentation. Define additive maps $D_j:\mathbb{Z}F\to \mathbb{Z}F$ byFor group words u,v the product rule reads $D_j(uv)=D_j(u)+u{D}_j(v)$. Differentiating $x_i{x}_i^{-1}=1$ forces $D_j(x_i^{-1})=-{\delta }_{ij}{x}_i^{-1}$. Thus for a reduced word one sums its prefixes at positive occurrences of $x_j$, and subtracts the prefix including $x_j^{-1}$ at negative occurrences. Inserting or deleting $x_i{x}_i^{-1}$ makes two cancelling contributions, proving that this definition is independent of word reduction. Linear extension proves the group-ring product rule and uniqueness.

The fundamental identity isIt holds on generators and inverses. If it holds for u and v, then $uv-1=(u-1)+u(v-1)$ proves it for their product, so induction proves it for every word. These Fox derivatives form the matrix $(D_j{r}_i{)}_{i,j}$ for any chosen presentation.

Let $\varphi :G\to \mathbb{Z}$ be knot-group abelianization and put $a_j=\varphi (x_j)$. Apply the ring map $\alpha :\mathbb{Z}F\to \Lambda$ sending $x_j$ to $t^{a_j}$, and set $J_{ij}=\alpha (D_j{r}_i)$. Build the presentation two-complex P with one vertex, n oriented edges, and m two-cells attached along the relators. Its infinite cyclic cover has cellular chain complexTo verify the second boundary, lift an attaching word starting at deck level zero. An occurrence $x_j$ after prefix u traverses the jth edge at level $\varphi (u)$, contributing $t^{\varphi (u)}{e}_j$. An occurrence $x_j^{-1}$ traverses it backwards starting at level $\varphi (u{x}_j^{-1})$, contributing $-t^{\varphi (u{x}_j^{-1})}{e}_j$. Their sum is exactly the evaluated Fox derivative. The fundamental identity, with $\alpha (r_i)=1$, gives $d_1{J}^T=0$.

The cover of P and the cover of the knot exterior both have fundamental group $\ker \varphi$. Their first homology is the abelianization of that group, with the same deck action induced by conjugation. Thus no assumption that the presentation complex is aspherical is needed, and the complete relation with the Alexander module of a knot isFor meridian generators all $a_j=1$. Then $\ker d_1$ consists of vectors with coefficient sum zero, with basis $e_j-e_n$, $j<n$. Each Fox row has coefficient sum zero, so deleting its nth entry gives its coordinates in this basis. Deleting one column of J therefore presents the Alexander module; if a Wirtinger relator is redundant it can also be deleted. This proves the matrix procedure used for the displayed knot above. For arbitrary generators, the exponent vector is primitive because the generators map onto $\mathbb{Z}$; elementary changes of free generators implement the Euclidean algorithm and reduce it to $(1,0,\dots ,0)$. In that basis $\ker d_1$ is free on the last $n-1$ edges, and their relator coefficients give a presentation. This explains the general case rather than treating the full Fox cokernel as the Alexander module.

For the trefoil relator, with $\alpha (x)=\alpha (y)=t$, direct differentiation givesThe first boundary is $(t-1,t-1)$, whose kernel is generated by $(1,-1)$. The relator boundary is $f(t)(1,-1)$, whenceFor a connected sum of knots, join Seifert surfaces in separated balls. Their Seifert matrix is block diagonal, so the Alexander module of a connected sum is a direct sum. Thus ${\mathcal{A}}_{T\#T}\cong (\Lambda /(f){)}^2$.

This module is not cyclic. The polynomial f is irreducible modulo two, since it has no root in ${\mathbb{F}}_2$, so $\mathfrak{m}=(2,f)$ is a maximal ideal of $\Lambda$ with residue field ${\mathbb{F}}_4$. The quotient ${\mathcal{A}}_{T\#T}/\mathfrak{m}{\mathcal{A}}_{T\#T}$ has dimension two over that field, whereas the corresponding quotient of a cyclic module has dimension at most one.

Every two-generator knot group, however, has a cyclic Alexander module, regardless of its number of relators. Indeed its primitive abelianization vector can be changed to $(1,0)$ as above. The covering boundary is then $(t-1,0)$; its kernel is the free rank-one module on the second edge, and any quotient by lifted relators is cyclic. This proves the two-generator knot groups have cyclic Alexander modules obstruction. Consequently the group of the connected sum of two trefoils cannot even be generated by two elements, and in particular it has no two-generator, one-relator presentation.

Number the seven crossings from top to bottom. Orient the strand entering the top-left arch downward. With the usual positive braid crossing convention, the crossing signs areTo make the diagram calculation reproducible, its oriented Gauss code isSubscripts record overpassing and underpassing. In this convention a positive trefoil knot has knot signature $-2$.

Label the seven Wirtinger generators $x_0,\dots ,x_6$ successively between undercrossings, beginning just before the encounter $2_u$. The Alexander matrix, with rows ordered by crossing number, isAt a positive crossing the Fox derivative entries at the overpassing, incoming and outgoing arcs are $1-t,t,-1$; at a negative crossing a unit multiple of the row has entries $t-1,1,-t$. Deleting the last row and column gives determinant $t(t^4-5t^3+7t^2-5t+1)$. Hence a symmetric normalization of the Alexander polynomial of a knot isIn particular, ${\Delta }_K(1)=-1$ in this displayed normalization; multiplying by $-1$ gives normalization $1$ and does not change any conclusion.

The Seifert algorithm produces four Seifert circles and seven bands. Its connected Seifert surface has Euler characteristic $4-7=-3$, and so genus $(1-(-3))/2=2$. Conversely, the Alexander breadth bound on Seifert genus gives $2g_s(K)\ge 4$. ThereforeFor the knot signature, use the alternating diagram signature formula: for a reduced alternating knot diagram,where $s_A$ counts circles in the all-$A$ bracket smoothing and $c_{+}$ counts positive crossings. Here the all-$A$ smoothing has four circles, the all-$B$ smoothing has five, and $c_{+}=5$. ThusThe opposite global knot signature convention gives $+2$ instead.

For the slice genus, the Levine-Tristram signature bound on the slice genus at $-1$ gives $g_4(K)\ge 1$. There is also an explicit unknotting crossing: switch crossing $3$. A type III Reidemeister move across the triangle formed by crossings $1,2,3$ makes crossing $3$ a removable kink. Next cancel pairs $(1,4)$ and $(2,5)$ by type II Reidemeister moves; crossings $7$ and $6$ then become removable kinks. This leaves the unknot. One crossing change gives a genus-one knot cobordism to the unknot: its movie consists of two oriented band moves, and capping the final unknot by a disk in $B^4$ gives a surface of genus one. Consequently

Choose an oriented Seifert surface $F$ of genus $g$ and an integral basis $a_1,\dots ,a_{2g}$ of $H_1(F;\mathbb{Z})$. Push $a_i$ in the positive normal direction to $F$. The Seifert matrix isIt represents the Seifert form. Its skew-symmetrization $V-V^T$ is the integral intersection form of $F$. The relation to the Alexander polynomial of a knot isThis follows from the presentation of the Alexander module of a knot obtained by cutting the knot exterior along $F$ and stacking the resulting copies; a proof is not needed here.

The printed genus inequality is false. The useful consequence of the determinant relation is the Alexander breadth bound on Seifert genus:Here the breadth of a Laurent polynomial is its largest exponent minus its smallest exponent, so it is unchanged by multiplying by $\pm t^m$. Indeed, for a minimal-genus Seifert surface, the matrix has size $2g_s(K)$ and each entry of $tV-V^T$ has degree at most one. Its nonzero determinant is an ordinary polynomial of degree at most $2g_s(K)$; its breadth is no larger than that degree. Equivalently, the highest exponent of a symmetrically normalized Alexander polynomial of a knot is at most $g_s(K)$. An unnormalized degree is not invariant under Laurent units.

For a counterexample to the printed inequality and the requested example, take the untwisted Whitehead double of a trefoil knot. The picture specifies the two-strand tangle in the zero Seifert framing; the two exterior caps form a Whitehead double clasp. The inset identifies the trefoil knot used as companion.

Its usual genus-one Seifert surface is a zero-framed annulus following the trefoil knot, joined by the clasp band. Choose the annulus core and a curve traversing the clasp band as the basis of its first homology. Zero annulus twisting gives the first self-linking number $0$. The clasp contributes a Hopf band with self-linking number $-1$ in the positive-clasp convention used here. Plumbing the bands contributes one linking in one push-off direction and none in the other. Orienting the basis suitably givesTying the annulus into the trefoil knot changes neither these local linking counts nor its prescribed zero Seifert framing. ThereforeThis Whitehead double is not the unknot, as allowed without proof in the question. Its Seifert genus is consequently at least one and at most one, hence exactly one. Thus $g_s(K)=1$ while every normalized constant Alexander polynomial of a knot has degree zero: a direct counterexample to the printed inequality.

Orient $S^3$ as the boundary of $B^4$. Push the interior of an oriented Seifert surface $F$ slightly into $B^4$, and let $X_F$ be the double branched covering of $B^4$ over this pushed-in surface. Its boundary is the two-fold branched cover of a knot. Define the knot signature byThe signature of a possibly degenerate intersection form means the number of positive eigenvalues minus the number of negative eigenvalues; its radical contributes zero.

Here is why the definition is independent of $F$. Given two choices $F_0,F_1$, glue their branched covers along the common boundary to obtainThis is the double branched covering of $S^4$ over the closed oriented surface obtained by gluing the pushed-in $F_0$ to $-F_1$. Every closed oriented surface in $S^4$ admits a Seifert hypersurface: its complement has an integral meridional class, represent it by a map to the circle, and take a regular value. Near the surface choose the angular map in its trivial normal disk bundle. The closure of a suitable regular fiber is a compact oriented three-manifold bounding the surface. Its trivial normal framing can be chosen to match this construction.

Push the interior of this Seifert hypersurface into $B^5$. The double branched covering of $B^5$ over the resulting properly embedded three-manifold has boundary $X$. The existence of the cover follows from the meridian homomorphism to $\mathbb{Z}/2$; smoothness near the branch set is the local map $(z,u)\mapsto (z^2,u)$. By the hypothesis about boundaries of five-manifolds, $\mathrm{sign}X=0$. Novikov additivity for gluing along an entire closed three-dimensional boundary givesThus the knot signature is independent of the Seifert surface. An isotopy of the knot carries the construction to an equivalent one, so it is also a knot invariant.

To calculate its intersection form, express $F$ as a disk with $2g$ bands. The double branched covering of $B^4$ over the pushed-in disk is again $B^4$. Each band lifts to a two-handle. The capped lifted cores give a basis of $H_2(X_F;\mathbb{Z})$ corresponding to the band-core basis of $H_1(F;\mathbb{Z})$. The framing of the $i$th lifted attaching circle is $2\mathrm{lk}(a_i^{+},a_i)=2V_{ii}$. For distinct bands, the two sheets contribute the two push-off linkings $V_{ij}$ and $V_{ji}$, so the mutual linking number is $V_{ij}+V_{ji}$. HenceA different integral basis changes this matrix by matrix congruence and leaves its signature unchanged.

In Figure 7 the upper knot is a connected sum of knots $T\#T$, while the lower one is $T\#\overline{T}$, where $T$ is the positive trefoil knot. Both knot groups have the same presentationTo see this, the Seifert-van Kampen theorem expresses the knot group of a connected sum of knots as the amalgamated free product of the two summand knot groups, amalgamating their meridians of a knot. A trefoil knot has presentation $⟨a,b\mid aba=bab⟩$ with $a$ a meridian. Reflection gives the same abstract group for the mirror. If it reverses the chosen meridian, send both generators to their inverses; the inverse braid relation is again the same relation. Thus the meridian amalgamation yields the displayed group presentation in both cases.

A band basis for the positive trefoil knot giveswhose symmetrization is negative definite. Therefore $\sigma (T)=-2$ and $\sigma (\overline{T})=2$. Boundary-connected-summing Seifert surfaces makes the Seifert matrix block diagonal, so the knot signature is additive under connected sum of knots. ConsequentlyThe upper knot and lower knot are therefore not isotopic, even though their knot groups are isomorphic. With the opposite global knot signature convention the first value is $+4$, and the distinction is unchanged.

Let $H_{+}$ be the positively oriented Hopf link obtained by closing a two-strand braid with two positive crossings. Switching one crossing gives the two-component unlink; the oriented smoothing gives the unknot. The printed skein relation givesRepresent the right-handed trefoil knot by the closure of the two-strand braid with three positive crossings. Switching one crossing gives the unknot, while its oriented smoothing gives $H_{+}$. Consequentlyso the two Jones polynomials areThe second expression follows from the mirror of a link identity. They are unequal Laurent polynomials, so invariance under link isotopy proves that the right-handed and left-handed trefoils are not isotopic.

The generators are the alpha-compressing disks, equivalently the four bounded regions. Each beta curve supplies the relator read from its signed intersections with the alpha curves. Since the basepoint region has generator $r_0=1$, the presentation isThe relations say $d=ba=cb=ac$. Eliminating $c,d$ leaves $bab=aba$, the standard two-generator presentation of the trefoil knot group, which checks the region conventions.

Let $K_1$ be the connected sum of $2022$ trefoils. The trefoil has Seifert genus one, and additivity of Seifert genus gives

Take the untwisted Whitehead double of a trefoil knot. The Whitehead pattern has winding number of a satellite pattern zero and becomes the unknot when its companion is the unknot. The Satellite formula for the Alexander polynomial therefore givesThe Whitehead pattern is geometrically essential in its solid torus, so the satellite knot with nontrivial companion $T_{2,3}$ is nontrivial. Hence $K_4$ is not isotopic to the unknot despite having trivial Alexander polynomial of a knot.

The component knot types can change under this Conway mutation. To construct an example, place a knotted arc carrying a trefoil knot summand in one strand of $D_1$ and a knotted arc carrying a figure-eight knot summand in one strand of $D_2$, leaving the other two strand portions trivial. Choose the outside pairing so that before rotation the two knotted portions lie on different components, while after rotation they lie on the same component. Then the component multisets arerespectively. A link isotopy preserves the unordered multiset of component knot types, so these links are not isotopic, although part (a) shows that suitable orientations give them the same Jones polynomial.

For nonzero coprime integers $p,q$, the torus knot $T_{p,q}$ lies on a standard unknotted torus in the three-sphere and winds $p$ times meridionally and $q$ times longitudinally. Here a meridian of a solid torus goes around the small cross-section of the doughnut, while the longitudinal direction goes around its central hole. The integers count signed turns, so changing one sign gives the mirror of a link of the torus knot. In this article $p$ is always the meridional count and $q$ the longitudinal count.

An explicit parametric curve in three-dimensional Euclidean space iswhere $R>r>0$. Its cylindrical radius $\rho =\sqrt{x^2+y^2}$ satisfies $(\rho -R{)}^2+z^2=r^2$, the equation of the supporting torus. Its meridional angle is $pt$ and its longitudinal angle is $qt$: this checks the convention directly rather than relying on the picture. Its squared speed isIf two parameter values give the same point, their difference $\delta$ satisfies $p\delta ,q\delta \in 2\pi \mathbb{Z}$. Bézout's identity for the coprime integers $p,q$ then gives $\delta \in 2\pi \mathbb{Z}$. Thus the loop closes and is an injective function on the parameter circle, with nonzero derivative; it is a smooth embedding.

For example, $R=2$, $r=0.7$, $p=2$, $q=3$ produces a trefoil knot. During one circuit the meridional angle changes by $4\pi$ and the longitudinal angle by $6\pi$. The supporting torus is a guide for construction, not a constraint on later ambient isotopies: the knot may move off it. This family makes arithmetic visible as geometry: the coprime integers determine whether a single traversal visits the whole loop without repetition.

The coprime integers hypothesis matters. If the greatest common divisor is $d=\gcd (|p|,|q|)>1$, the same parametric curve retraces a single component $d$ times; it does not automatically draw $d$ different components. The corresponding torus link is instead the full set of points on the torus whose angles satisfy $q\varphi -p\theta \in 2\pi \mathbb{Z}$, with meridional angle $\varphi$ and longitudinal angle $\theta$. It has $d$ disjoint components, each with winding counts $(p/d,q/d)$. For instance, the torus link $T_{2,2}$ consists of two parallel $(1,1)$ loops and is a Hopf link, whereas substituting $(2,2)$ into ${\gamma }_{p,q}$ simply traces one of those loops twice.

The trefoil is the torus knot $T_{2,3}$. It is the simplest nontrivial knot by crossing number of a knot: $c(T_{2,3})=3$. A standard three-crossing alternating knot diagram is reduced, so the Tait crossing-number theorem establishes minimality. The four-crossing knot diagram shown below also represents the trefoil knot, illustrating that a particular projection need not achieve that minimum. Its Seifert genus is one.

Here is a small algebraic certificate that a trefoil knot cannot be deformed into an unknot. One Seifert matrix for a trefoil knot isTaking the determinant gives the Alexander polynomial of a knotwhere $\doteq$ allows multiplication by a Laurent unit $\pm t^n$ in the Laurent polynomial ring. No such multiplication turns this three-term Alexander polynomial of a knot into the unknot's value $1$. Since the Alexander polynomial of a knot is a knot invariant, this computation rules out every possible ambient isotopy between the two knots; it does not merely rule out the deformations we happened to try.

The knot group supplies another certificate. The presentation $⟨a,b\mid a^2=b^3⟩$ maps onto the symmetric group $S_3$ by $a\mapsto (12)$ and $b\mapsto (123)$, since both sides of the relation map to the identity. These images generate a non-abelian group, so the knot group cannot be the unknot's infinite cyclic group. However, a trefoil knot and its mirror of a link have isomorphic knot groups: the abstract knot group alone does not distinguish all knots.