We work in the usual real-valued setting of the Chebyshev alternation theorem. For and an algebraic polynomial of degree at most , the theorem says that is a best uniform approximation if and only if its error has ordered points with alternating maximal values:
If , the zero-error case is included directly.
Existence follows, for example, by taking a minimizing sequence: its supremum norms are bounded, all norms on the finite-dimensional polynomial space are equivalent, and a convergent coefficient subsequence attains the infimum. To prove uniqueness of best uniform polynomial approximation, let both attain the minimum error . Their average has error at most by the triangle inequality and therefore exactly by minimality.
If , both polynomials equal and are equal. Otherwise apply the Chebyshev alternation theorem to . At every alternating extremal point, is either or . But it is the average of and , each lying in . An average attains an endpoint of this interval only when both entries equal that endpoint. Hence at all points. The difference is a degree-at-most- polynomial with more than distinct zeros, so it is identically zero. The best approximating polynomial is unique.
Fix the degree bound . Existence can be proved without a general uniqueness theorem: a minimizing sequence in is uniformly bounded because its distances from are bounded. Values at any fixed distinct points determine its coefficients through an invertible Vandermonde matrix, so those coefficients are bounded. A convergent subsequence supplies a polynomial attaining the minimum.
For uniqueness of best uniform polynomial approximation, suppose and attain the same minimum , and let . The triangle inequality makes another minimizer. If , both polynomials equal , so assume . Put and . At each , the two real errors and lie in and their average equals an endpoint. Hence they are equal there, and .
The set must contain at least points. Otherwise interpolate the values on its at most points by a polynomial . Then on . Continuity gives this positivity on a neighbourhood of , while the error has a strict gap below on the compact complement. A sufficiently small positive multiple of decreases the maximum error, contradicting optimality of . This is an elementary perturbation argument, not an appeal to Haar's theorem.
Thus has at least distinct zeros. A polynomial of degree at most with that many zeros is identically zero. The best uniform polynomial is unique for every fixed degree bound: .