A universal theory can be axiomatized by sentences whose quantifiers are all universal. Such sentences often forbid specified finite configurations.
The universal consequences of a first-order theory are all universal first-order sentences entailed by . Their model class is exactly the class of substructures of models of , up to structure embedding. This characterization follows from the diagram embedding criterion for universal theories.
A first-order theory has its class of first-order models closed under substructures of a first-order structure exactly when it is equivalent to its universal consequences . If , then is consistent. Otherwise a finite logical conjunction of signed diagram of a structure sentences yields a universal consequence false in . The compactness theorem gives a first-order model of containing an embedded copy of , and closure under substructures of a first-order structure implies . The converse is preservation of universal sentences. The diagram of a structure must include negated as well as positive atomic sentences so that the resulting map is an embedding, not just a homomorphism.
A universal sentence has the form with quantifier-free formula , including an empty quantifier block. Its truth passes from a first-order structure to every substructure of a first-order structure: tuples from the smaller domain are also tuples of the larger domain, and quantifier-free truth agrees. Therefore a first-order theory of universal sentences has a first-order model class closed under substructures of a first-order structure.
If failure of a property has a finite witness, one can often axiomatize the property by a universal sentence forbidding each possible finite witness. Compactness supplies finite witnesses when failure is expressed by inconsistency of an associated theory.
Articles by others on the same topic
There are currently no matching articles.