Dirichlet-Jordan convergence theorem 2026-10-06
The Fourier series of a periodic function of bounded variation converges at each point to the mean of its two one-sided limits. In particular, it converges to the function at continuity points. Periodizing a compact interval introduces jumps at its integer endpoints; their half-values explain the half-weight convention in the Van der Corput sum-integral lemma. The conclusion is pointwise convergence, not a claim of absolute convergence of every such Fourier series.
For , , and , the displayed approximation holds away from the pole. Apply the Van der Corput sum-integral lemma to on , where its derivative has modulus at most one half. Abel summation with converts the bounded unweighted discrepancy to . Locally uniform convergence of this weighted discrepancy extends the identity from to . It turns estimates for finite exponential sums into estimates for the Riemann zeta function.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2014 iii Paper 25 1 b Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-06
We use the Van der Corput sum-integral lemma. Put and . The Fourier series of the periodization of giveswhere integer endpoints have half weight. This is the Dirichlet-Jordan convergence theorem for a piecewise smooth, or more generally bounded-variation, periodic function. Here is , so the periodized function has bounded variation. Changing to the requested endpoint convention costs at most one.
Write . For , . Since is continuous and monotone, the reciprocal has bounded variation, and integration by parts in the Riemann-Stieltjes sense yieldsThe variation of the reciprocal is at most . Summing over gives , separating and using convergence of . For each endpoint, useThe symmetric partial sums of the first term are a constant multiple of , uniformly bounded in and ; this standard Fourier series bound follows by splitting at and applying Abel summation to the remaining sine sum. The second term is absolutely summable with bound . The same bound therefore holds for the whole sum of the integrals. Since is the ordinary integral,No second derivative is required; monotonicity supplies the needed variation estimate.
For the Hardy-Littlewood approximation to the Riemann zeta function, take . On , and is monotone. The proved lemma says that the difference between the partial sum of and its integral over is uniformly in . Weighted Abel summation with the decreasing weight then makes the weighted difference , since its total variation on is . Initially for , the tail integral is . The bounded primitive of the discrepancy gives a locally uniformly convergent weighted discrepancy integral for every , continuing the identity to that region. Thus, away from the pole,If the ordinary sum-integral comparison supplies the same estimate. At the formula is understood meromorphically. It approximates the Riemann zeta function by a finite Dirichlet polynomial, transfers exponential sum estimates to bounds in the critical strip, yields elementary near-one bounds for and its derivative, and supports estimates for the mean value of Dirichlet polynomials and numerical calculations.