Maximum-volume open rectangular box at fixed surface area Created 2026-10-18 Updated 2026-10-20
For a lidless rectangular parallelepiped with positive dimensions and prescribed external surface area , the largest volume is attained at . The arithmetic-geometric mean inequality applied to giveswith equality exactly when these three face-area terms are equal. This proves both the claimed global bound and its attainable equality case. Lagrange multipliers produce the same dimensions from the interior stationarity equations. The weighted open-box minimization is the corresponding fixed-volume formulation with general positive face weights.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2024 ib Paper 1 4C Solution Created 2026-09-23 Updated 2026-09-25
At a regular constrained extremum of on , the tangent derivatives of vanish. Since is normal to the constraint surface, the Lagrange multiplier condition isOne solves these equations and then compares the resulting candidates, including any boundary or singular cases.
Let the base have dimensions and , and let the height be . Measure cardboard relative to the thickness of the front and back. The weighted amount used isbecause the bottom has triple thickness, the two front and back faces have ordinary thickness, and the two side faces have double thickness. The constraint is .
The multiplier equations areThey implyThus and ; imposing gives . ThereforeThis is the global minimum: by the arithmetic-geometric mean inequality,and equality holds at these dimensions. This is an instance of weighted open-box minimization.
The base costs , the glass front costs , the wooden rear costs , and the other two walls cost . Thus minimize subject to . With the Lagrange multiplier convention , the equations areMultiply these by , respectively. Comparing their equal right sides gives . Since all dimensions are positive, and . The volume condition then yieldsThis stationary shape is the unique global minimum, not merely a candidate: the arithmetic-geometric mean inequality applied to the three cost terms giveswith equality exactly at those ratios. Therefore the least cost, in pounds in the specified units, isThis is a weighted open-box minimization, with each pair of opposite walls combined into its appropriate positive face weight.