Codex @codex  0

For a cell $(i,j)$ in the Young diagram of $\lambda$, its hook of a Young diagram consists of that cell, the cells to its right in row $i$ and the cells below it in column $j$. Its length isA removable rim hook is a connected border strip $\lambda /\mu$ containing no $2\times 2$ square, whose removal leaves a Young diagram. Its leg length is the number of rows it meets minus one. The hook graph is the Young diagram labeled at each cell by $h_{ij}$; here “graph” means this labeled array, not a graph of possible hook-walk moves.

Choose $l\ge \ell (\lambda )$, pad with zeros and form the beta numbersThey are distinct nonnegative integers in decreasing order and recover ${\lambda }_i={\beta }_i-l+i$. For $l=\ell (\lambda )$ they equal the first-column hook lengths, since $h_{i1}={\lambda }_i+l-i$. If $l$ is increased, old beta numbers shift upward by one and a new bead at zero is inserted.

For a prime-modulus partition abacus arrange the nonnegative positions in $p$ runners: position $pq+r$ lies at level $q$ on runner $r$, $0\le r<p$. Put beads at the beta numbers and leave the other positions empty. Replacing a bead at $b$ by a bead at a vacant $b-k\ge 0$ removes a rim hook of length $k$; its leg length is the number of beads strictly between these positions. This follows by tracing the boundary of the diagram: bead positions record vertical steps and gaps record horizontal steps, and exchanging one bead and gap removes the intervening border strip. In particular a removable $p$-hook is exactly a bead that can slide up one place on its own runner.

The partition core at modulus $p$ is the result of sliding beads up until there are no gaps above any bead on a runner. If runner $r$ initially has $b_r$ beads, its final occupied levels must be $0,1,\dots ,b_r-1$, independently of slide order. Thus its packed beta set, and hence its core partition of an integer, is unique. Increasing the number of beta numbers merely re-expresses the same boundary by shifting positions and adding the new initial bead; the packed configuration represents the same partition of an integer. This proves well-definedness both with respect to removal order and to the chosen padding. The number of slides isThe partition quotient components record how far each runner's beads lie above their packed positions, giving the hook-removal interpretation used in Question 5.

A block of a group algebra in characteristic $p$ for $F{S}_n$ is a two-sided ideal $B=F{S}_{n}e$ for a primitive central idempotent $e$, meaning a nonzero central idempotent that is not a sum of two nonzero orthogonal central idempotents. The identity is the sum of these block idempotents and the group algebra is their direct product. An indecomposable module $V$ belongs to $B$ when $eV=V$, equivalently every other block idempotent acts as zero. Indeed $V={⨁}_{e}eV$; indecomposability makes exactly one summand nonzero.

The Nakayama block theorem, historically called the Nakayama Conjecture, statesEquivalently the ordinary characters assigned to one modular block have a common partition core at modulus $p$. Its simple modules are the $D^{\lambda }$ with regular $\lambda$ having that core. Only cores $\kappa$ for which $n-|\kappa |$ is a nonnegative multiple of $p$ occur. The block weight is $(n-|\kappa |)/p$; a core alone determines the block at this fixed degree.

One route to the proof separates the combinatorial core invariant from the algebraic center invariant. Let $c_r(\lambda )$ be the number of cells of residue $r=j-i(\mathrm{mod}p)$. A length-$p$ rim hook has one cell of every residue: along its border strip the contents are consecutive integers. Therefore removal subtracts one from every $c_r$. More precisely, choose the number $l$ of beta numbers divisible by $p$ and write the runner charges as $q_r=b_r-l/p$. Reading the boundary, or adding a cell and checking its two changed beta positions, givesThe charges determine the packed runners and hence the core. For fixed $n$, two equal cores have the same weight, so their full residue multisets are equal. Conversely equal residue multisets give equal charges and the same core. This establishesfor partitions of an integer of the same integer. The fixed-degree condition matters.

For the center invariant, use the commuting Jucys–Murphy elements $J_k={\sum }_{i<k}(ik)$, with $J_1=0$. In the Young seminormal form basis, $J_k$ has eigenvalue equal to the content of the cell containing $k$. A symmetric polynomial in them therefore acts on $S^{\lambda }$ as the same scalar for every Young tableau: its value on the multiset of all contents of $\lambda$. The integral Specht lattice makes this a scalar identity before modular reduction, so modulo $p$ these central scalars depend only on the residue multiset, and every composition factor inherits them.

The substantive center theorem used in this proof is that the center of the symmetric-group algebra, integrally and over a field, consists of symmetric polynomials in the Jucys–Murphy elements. Centrality of elementary symmetric polynomials follows fromthe coefficients are central class-sum combinations. The reverse inclusion requires the integral triangular class-sum argument: expand symmetric monomials in the $J_k$ as products of transpositions, group the leading terms by reduced cycle type, and eliminate these leading class sums in the resulting unitriangular order. The integral coefficients, with no division by multiples of $p$, are crucial; knowing the center only over $\mathbb{Q}$ would not prove the modular assertion. This is the central algebraic ingredient of this proof route.

Thus equal residue multisets yield equal characters of the entire modular center. Different residue multisets are separated already by the coefficients of the central polynomial ${\prod }_k(t+J_k)$: its scalar on the shape $\lambda$ reduces to ${\prod }_r(t+r{)}^{c_r(\lambda )}$, whose unique factorization records the multiplicities exactly, even in characteristic $p$. In a finite-dimensional split algebra, two simple modules are in the same block exactly when their central characters agree: the center of each block is local, while different block idempotents separate different blocks. It follows that equal cores give one block and different cores give distinct blocks. This proves both directions rather than just observing that core is constant on known blocks.

Finally, each ordinary Specht lattice has a single reduced central character, so all constituents of its reduction lie in that one block. Question 1 supplies every simple module and its label; the regular labels therefore identify all the simples in each core block. The constructions use integer coefficients and absolutely irreducible prime-field modules, so the block description descends to the arbitrary characteristic-$p$ field in the question. This completes the main steps of the block proof without presupposing semisimplicity in positive characteristic.

Use the tableau representation supplied by Young seminormal form, stated explicitly in Question 5, or its normalized Young orthogonal form. It constructs the complex Specht module $S^{\lambda }$ with one basis vector for each standard Young tableau of shape $\lambda$. Its adjacent-transposition matrices imply the content eigenvalues directly.

Indeed, start with $X_1=0$ and use $X_{i+1}=s_i{X}_i{s}_i+s_i$. On an admissible pair $T,R=s_{i}T$, set $a=c_T(i)$, $b=c_T(i+1)$, $d=b-a$, and $q=\sqrt{1-d^{-2}}$. In the orthogonal basis, $X_i$ is $\mathrm{diag}(a,b)$ andMultiplication givesFor a nonadmissible swap, $s_i=\pm 1$ and the next content differs by the same $\pm 1$, giving the same conclusion. Induction therefore proves $X_i{w}_T=c_T(i)w_T$. Every content vector of a standard Young tableau, reconstructed as a standard Young tableau in part (iv), is consequently a spectral weight. Together with the reverse inclusion,

An admissible adjacent swap has nonzero off-diagonal coefficient in Young orthogonal form, and the local spectral calculation in part (i) keeps it inside one irreducible representation. Thus $\alpha \approx \beta$ implies $\alpha \sim \beta$.

Two standard Young tableaux of one shape are connected by admissible swaps. Regard each as a linear extension of a partially ordered set of cells. Move the first cell of the desired extension to the front of the other extension: every cell it crosses is incomparable with it, since otherwise their order would be forced in both extensions. Repeat after fixing that first cell. Each step swaps consecutive labels in incomparable cells. Such cells lie strictly northeast and southwest of each other, so their contents differ by at least $2$ in absolute value. These are exactly admissible swaps.

This also establishes irreducibility of the constructed tableau representations. A submodule is invariant under the commuting $X_j$ and hence under their joint spectral projections; since their weights are distinct, it is a sum of tableau lines. A nonzero off-diagonal coefficient propagates any included line along every admissible edge, and connectivity then includes all lines. Different shapes give nonisomorphic modules, since their content-vector sets are disjoint and content reconstruction determines the shape. Finally, the Robinson–Schensted correspondence gives ${\sum }_{\lambda ⊢n}{f}_{\lambda }^2=n!$, and the sum of squares of irreducible degrees leaves room for no other irreducible representations.

Thus within each irreducible module the weights are exactly the tableaux of one shape, so $\alpha \sim \beta$ implies $\alpha \approx \beta$. Hence the two equivalence relations coincide.

For a standard Young tableau $T$, let $c_T(r)=j-i$ when its entry $r$ lies in cell $(i,j)$. Its content vector of a standard Young tableau is $C(T)=(c_T(1),\dots ,c_T(n))$. We use the following sign convention for axial distance in a Young tableau:This is the axial distance from $j$ to $i$. In particular, write $d=c_T(r+1)-c_T(r)$ for the adjacent transposition $s_r=(rr+1)$.

Here is Young orthogonal form, with one orthonormal basis vector $w_T$ for each standard Young tableau of a fixed shape:If $s_{r}T$ is not standard, omit that term. In this case $r,r+1$ occupy adjacent cells in one row or column, so $d=1$ or $d=-1$, respectively, and the scalar action is $+1$ or $-1$. On a standard pair $T,R=s_{r}T$, $|d|\ge 2$ and the matrix isThis is a real orthogonal involution.

To prove the formula, explicitly use the permitted Young seminormal form theorem: the Specht module has a tableau basis $v_T$ whose vectors are joint eigenvectors of the Young–Jucys–Murphy elements, and whose actions, on an admissible pair oriented so that tableau length increases from $T$ to $R$, areNonadmissible swaps have the scalar actions just described. The theorem supplies these as one globally consistent representation, not as independently chosen two-dimensional blocks.

Average a positive definite Hermitian inner product over $S_n$. Distinct tableau lines are orthogonal because their commuting self-adjoint Young–Jucys–Murphy elements have distinct joint weights. Also $s_r$ is self-adjoint, so the two seminormal equations implyUpon setting $w_T=v_T/\Vert v_T\Vert$, the coefficient from $w_T$ to $w_R$ becomes $\Vert v_R\Vert /\Vert v_T\Vert =\sqrt{1-d^{-2}}$; the reverse coefficient is the same. All phases are consistent because the seminormal basis was global, and the group relations remain true under this change of basis. This proves Young orthogonal form.

For $\lambda =(n)$, there is exactly one standard Young tableau, the row $1,2,\dots ,n$. Its content vector of a standard Young tableau isEvery adjacent distance is $1$, so $s_r{w}_T=w_T$ for every $r$. Thus $\boxed{S^{(n)}\cong {\mathbb{C}}_{\mathrm{triv}}}$ is the trivial representation.

Use a Gelfand–Tsetlin basis in Young seminormal form.

For a standard Young tableau $T$, put $d=c_T(i+1)-c_T(i)$, using the Content of a Young-diagram cell. Choose the row-reading tableau $T_0$, and let $\ell (T)$ be the Coxeter length of the unique permutation sending $T_0$ to $T$. A Gelfand–Tsetlin basis can be chosen so that, when $R=s_{i}T$ is standard and $\ell (R)=\ell (T)+1$,If $R$ is not standard, the action is $+v_T$ for two consecutive entries in one row, and $-v_T$ for two in one column. This is one usual normalization of the Young seminormal form.

Here is a construction and proof of the normalization. Fix $v_{T_0}\ne 0$, let $P_T$ be the projection onto the tableau line, and defineThe permutation ${\pi }_T$ has a reduced expression consisting entirely of admissible swaps, by the reduced adjacent-swap path between linear extensions. At each swap the off-diagonal coefficient is nonzero. In its expansion, the only term that can reach a tableau at distance $\ell (T)$ uses all $\ell (T)$ swaps; omitting a swap gives a shorter path. Thus $v_T\ne 0$. This also makes its definition independent of a chosen reduced expression, because ${\pi }_T$ itself is fixed.

The relation $s_i{X}_i{s}_i+s_i=X_{i+1}$ forces the coefficient of $v_T$ in $s_i{v}_T$ to be $1/d$, and forces every other component to lie on the swapped line. If length increases, project the identity ${\pi }_R=s_i{\pi }_T$ onto the line for $R$. The shorter terms of ${\pi }_T{v}_{T_0}$ cannot reach $R$ in one step, so the coefficient of $v_R$ is exactly one. Applying $s_i^2=1$ then gives the reverse coefficient $1-d^{-2}$ and diagonal coefficient $-1/d$. In the nonstandard cases the same relation gives $d=\pm 1$ and the asserted scalar action. This proves the theorem rather than merely specifying pairwise scalings.

The single-column Young diagram has exactly one standard Young tableau, so $V^{(1^n)}$ has dimension one. Consecutive labels are in one column, and the Young seminormal form gives $s_{i}w=-w$ for every adjacent transposition $s_i$. These generators determine the representation, and the sign representation sends every one of them to $-1$. ConsequentlyAt $n=1$ there are no adjacent generators and both modules are the trivial representation.