Main implementations: the same as electronic switches: vacuum tubes in the past, and transistors in the second half of the 20th century.

The fundamental intuition about capacitors is that they never let electrons through.

They can only absorb electrons up to a certain point, but then the pushback becomes too strong, and current stops.

Therefore, they cannot conduct direct current long term.

For alternating current however, things are different, because in alternating current, electrons are just jiggling back and forward a little bit around a center point. So you can send alternating current power across a capacitor.

The key equation that relates Voltage to electric current in the capacitor is:So if a voltage Heavyside step function is applied what happens is:More realistically, one may consider the behavior or the series RC circuit to see what happens without infinities when a capacitor is involved as in the step response of the series RC circuit.

Ideally can be thought of as a one-way ticket gate that only lets electrons go in one direction with zero resistance! Real devices do have imperfections however, so there is some resistance.

First they were made out of vacuum tubes, but later semiconductor diodes were invented and became much more widespread.

Something where DC voltage comes in, and a periodic voltage comes out.

It resists to change in electric current. Well seen at: Video "LC circuit by Eugene Khutoryansky (2016)".

When Ciro Santilli was studying electronics at the University of São Paulo, the courses, which were heavily inspired from the USA 50's were obsessed by this one! Thinking about it, it is kind of a cool thing though.

That Wikipedia page is the epitome of Wikipedia failure to explain things in a way that is of any interest to any learner. Video 1. "Tutorial on LC resonant circuits by w2aew (2012)" is the opposite.

TEM: sample has to be very thin, you get a 2D image. Higher resolution possible.

SEM: sample does not need to be ultra thin, you get a 3D image. Lower resolution possible.

It sees and moves individual atoms!!!

This technique has managed to determine protein 3D structures for proteins that people were not able to crystallize for X-ray crystallography.

It is said however that cryoEM is even fiddlier than X-ray crystallography, so it is mostly attempted if crystallization attempts fail.

By looking at Figure 1. "A cryoEM image", you can easily understand the basics of cryoEM.

We just put a gazillion copies of our molecule of interest in a solution, and then image all of them in the frozen water.

Each one of them appears in the image in a random rotated view, so given enough of those point of view images, we can deduce the entire 3D structure of the molecule.

Ciro Santilli once watched a talk by Richard Henderson about cryoEM circa 2020, where he mentioned that he witnessed some students in the 1980's going to Germany, and coming into contact with early cryoEM. And when they came back, they just told their principal investigator: "I'm going to drop my PhD theme and focus exclusively on cryoEM". That's how hot the cryo thing was! So cool.