The 2D IR waiting time is the controlled interval between excitation-related coherence evolution and later detection-related evolution in a two-dimensional infrared spectroscopy pulse sequence. It is often denoted or . Varying it asks how the sample's response changes between preparation and observation; it is distinct from the delays transformed into the two frequency coordinates.
A primary phase-controlled peptide experiment measured vibrational echo phase and amplitude as multiple pulse delays varied, providing a physical implementation of this multidelay spectroscopy.[ref]
Two-dimensional infrared spectroscopy of peptides by phase-controlled femtosecond vibrational photon echoes by M. C. Asplund and others. Abstract, multiple pulse delays and phase-sensitive detection.
The exact meaning of a fitted waiting-time change depends on which response pathways the experiment selects.An original illustrative model separates population loss from growth of a transferred component. Let total observable excited-state population decay as and let a transferred fraction grow as . Stipulate matched response factors and signalsWith and , the cross signal is approximately0.233 at but0.117 at . Meanwhile the transferred fraction increases from0.632 to0.865. A decreasing raw 2D IR cross peak need not imply a decreasing transferred fraction.
Under these particular assumptions, 2D IR population normalization gives . The raw cross signal reaches its maximum atwhich is approximately1.39ps here. This is an explicitly stipulated kinetic example, not a universal normalization rule or an inference of exchange from one peak.
At very short intervals, pulse overlap and coherent effects can matter; at long intervals, vibrational relaxation can leave little signal. Report pulse timing, normalization and the response model when assigning a waiting-time dependence to molecular dynamics.
New to topics? Read the docs here!