Camber describes the departure of an airfoil mean camber line from the straight airfoil chord. A common scalar measure is the largest normal distance from that line to the chord, often divided by chord length. Its sign, position and full chordwise distribution matter when specifying a profile. A symmetric airfoil has zero airfoil camber under the corresponding midpoint convention.[ref]
Wing Geometry by NASA Glenn Research Center. Airfoil Geometry, distinction between chord line, mean line, camber and thickness
For an original camber-line model, let and chooseIts derivative is , so the maximum is at , with . With and , the maximum displacement is . Doubling all lengths doubles this displacement while preserving the three-percent camber. This full-chord parabola is a stipulated example, not the piecewise mean line of NACA 2412.
Camber height is not itself curvature. In this example , so the midpoint curvature magnitude is because the slope there vanishes. Uniform geometric scaling preserves the camber-to-chord ratio while changing curvature inversely with scale. Nor does the maximum height alone determine the mean-line slopes at other stations.
In thin airfoil theory, the mean-line shape shifts the zero-lift angle of attack; finite positive lift can occur at zero incidence. Determining that shift requires the mean-line distribution, rather than substituting a camber percentage for an angle. The independent shape choices in the early NACA programme were tested by measuring aerodynamic characteristics while systematically varying thickness and mean-line form.[ref]
New to topics? Read the docs here!