Catherine B. McGinley is identified as a Langley researcher and coauthor with Dan H. Neuhart of a 2004 experimental report on wind-tunnel turbulence intensity. The primary title page establishes this byline; the report connects the claimed flow quality to a documented measurement procedure.[ref]
Free-Stream Turbulence Intensity in the Langley 14- by 22-Foot Subsonic Tunnel by Dan H. Neuhart and Catherine B. McGinley. Title page and printed pp. 7–9, apparatus and data analysis
The experiment used calibrated hot-wire anemometry to convert electrical signals into mean and fluctuating velocity. Its comparisons included different positions and tunnel operating conditions. Calibration and retained frequency range belong to the interpretation of a turbulence result; the report's Figure 20 explicitly examines bandwidth sensitivity.[ref]
Free-Stream Turbulence Intensity in the Langley 14- by 22-Foot Subsonic Tunnel by Dan H. Neuhart and Catherine B. McGinley. Printed pp. 8–9, hot-wire calibration; Figure 20, integration-bandwidth comparison
An original calculation illustrates why a numerical turbulence intensity needs a scale. With , stipulate and mean speed . Then . If an independent additive measurement-noise component has RMS , the observed fluctuation RMS becomesgiving . Subtracting RMS values directly would give the wrong answer; independence permits subtraction of variances. These stipulated numbers are not measurements from the report. The example shows why a small recorded fluctuation cannot be interpreted without considering apparatus noise and the measurement model.
New to topics? Read the docs here!