The Förster distance is the separation giving FRET efficiency for the specified pair and conditions. It is a property of the optical pair and its environment, rather than a universal length. In the usual pair model,where is the FRET dipole orientation factor, the FRET donor quantum yield, the FRET spectral overlap integral, and the medium's refractive index. The omitted proportionality constant depends on the unit convention for .[ref]
Advanced Fluorescence Microscopy Techniques—FRAP, FLIP, FLAP, FRET and FLIM by Hellen C. Ishikawa-Ankerhold and others. §3.1, equations 16–18: factors controlling Förster distance
If FRET efficiency is known and those assumptions hold, inversion givesThe derivative explains why errors become troublesome near or . An illustrative pair with nanometres and another with nanometres both give at their different Förster distances: knowing FRET efficiency alone does not determine .
A heterogeneous population adds another ambiguity. In a synthetic example with equal weights per FRET donor excitation, efficiencies and average to , but their separations are and . Their average separation is approximately , whereas inverting the average FRET efficiency gives . A measured emission ratio has additional detection weights; it need not equal even this excitation-weighted average. The transferable lesson is that an average readout does not uniquely specify a distribution of molecular separations.
New to topics? Read the docs here!