Group delay versus pulse-front arrival for an RC load

ID: group-delay-versus-pulse-front-arrival-for-an-rc-load

Group delay versus pulse-front arrival for an RC load distinguishes a narrow-band modulation displacement from the earliest response to a newly applied input. For the relative amplifier-load model in group delay introduced by a capacitive amplifier load, the causal impulse response is for and zero for . Its convolution with an input that vanishes before zero also vanishes before zero. Nevertheless its group delay is , which is positive and frequency dependent. The phase-derivative definition concerns spectral components and their envelopes.[ref]
An original finite-pulse calculation shows why a threshold measurement gives another time. For an initially relaxed load, apply a rectangular pulse of height and duration . Convolution gives
The first mathematical response occurs immediately after zero. A rising threshold equal to fraction of the input pulse height is reached at only if the pulse lasts at least that long. This is the threshold-crossing time of a finite rectangular pulse through an RC load.
With and , the largest output is only : a threshold is never reached. If instead, that threshold is crossed at . Neither value is the group delay evaluated at .
A pulse generator and oscilloscope can compare the threshold observation with a slow modulation on a carrier; the chosen threshold and modulation bandwidth must be recorded. MIT's laboratory likewise separates square-wave decay measurements from sinusoidal amplitude/phase measurements.[ref] If wiring adds a transport delay , shift the impulse response to : the front moves to , while the modulation delay becomes . The immediate onset of the unshifted lumped model is not a model of propagation along a finite-length cable.

New to topics? Read the docs here!