Partitioning passive recoil equilibrium
ID: partitioning-passive-recoil-equilibrium
Partitioning passive recoil equilibrium separates the elastic pressure contributions of the lung and chest wall at a shared volume. With transpulmonary pressure and wall pressure ,At a passive, open-airway equilibrium the total is zero, but the lung and wall contributions can be equal and opposite rather than individually zero. Their pressure references determine what is being added.[ref]
Anatomy and Physiology 2e by J. Gordon Betts and others. §22.3, pleural pressure and opposing elastic recoil
The component-elastance ambiguity in total recoil measurements persists away from equilibrium. An original linear family writeswhere is total stiffness and . Every choice of and produces the identical total curve . Measuring that total curve alone cannot identify either the baseline pressure partition or the component slopes.
For stipulated , L and cm water, choosing gives equal component slopes of 5. Choosing gives slopes 8 and 2. At equilibrium both cases even have the same component pressures, and . After a 0.5 L increase, the pressure increments are either 2.5 plus 2.5 or 4 plus 1 cm water. Both totals equal 5 cm water.
The respective lung compliances are 0.20 and , while the chest-wall compliances are 0.20 and 0.50. The combined compliance is 0.10 in either case. Thus one equilibrium internal-pressure reading, in addition to the total curve, still does not determine both component slopes.
A measurement series with a justified pleural pressure estimate supplies the missing partition across volume. The 1959 primary study used an intra-esophageal balloon, a mouthpiece connection and differential pressure recording to obtain such internal mechanical information.[ref]
Airway Resistance and Lung Compliance by Ole Storstein and others. Methods, balloon catheter and Sanborn differential pressure transducer
The estimate's positioning and relation to pleural pressure require validation. Passive conditions matter as well: respiratory-muscle pressure would add another contribution to an equation intended to describe elastic recoil alone. New to topics? Read the docs here!