 Solution

The two approaches to the slit base are distinct boundary points, each with interior angle $\pi /2$, whereas the slit tip has interior angle $2\pi$. Their exponents in the Schwarz-Christoffel formula are therefore $-1/2$, $1$ and $-1/2$. Write $a=x_2\in (-1,1)$ and takeon the upper half-plane, with the branch normalized by $S(z)\sim z$ at infinity. The derivative has the formOn $-1<x<1$, the upper boundary value is $S_{+}(x)=i\sqrt{1-x^2}$. Both endpoints of this interval map to the slit base, soThe odd term integrates to zero, and $c\ne 0$; hence $\boxed{x_2=0}$. Now $S^{\prime }(z)=z/S(z)$, so $f=cS+b$. The endpoint values force $b=0$, and the tip value, using $S(0)=i$ as a boundary limit, forces $c=1$. ThusThe branch is important: on $x>1$ its boundary value is positive real, on $x<-1$ negative real, and on $(-1,1)$ positive imaginary. The intervals $(-1,0)$ and $(0,1)$ traverse the two sides of the slit, meeting at its tip.

The map is injective in the upper half-plane: equal images imply $z_1^2=z_2^2$, and the alternative $z_1=-z_2$ cannot put both points in that half-plane. Its derivative has no interior zero. The image has positive imaginary part, by continuity of the branch and the fact that an interior real image would require $z^2-1$ to be nonnegative real, which is impossible for $\mathrm{Im}z>0$. Conversely, a point $\zeta$ in the upper half-plane outside the slit gives a unique upper-half-plane root of $z^2={\zeta }^2+1$. A point $\zeta =iy$ with $0<y\le 1$ gives only real roots or zero and is excluded. These observations verify that the image is exactly the required slit domain, rather than just matching its boundary.