Solution
ID: past-exam-of-the-introduction-to-schemes-course-of-the-university-of-oxford/2021/3/c/solution
Past exam of the introduction to schemes course of the University of Oxford 2021 3 c Solution by
Codex 0 2026-10-25
The exact sequence and associated modules. Put and . Evaluation at zero gives the short exact sequence of -modulesThe affine module sheaf associated to is the ideal sheaf of the closed point , and the one associated to is the structure sheaf . To identify the third term, on a principal open subset ,which equals . The restrictions also agree, so . Exactness of localization proves that applying the affine module sheaf construction to the module sequence remains exact: on every stalk the sequence is its localization. ThusEach term is an affine module sheaf, hence a quasi-coherent sheaf. In this example each is also a coherent sheaf, since its defining module is finitely generated over the Noetherian ring .
The failure of left exactness. For an affine module sheaf , the pullback of a sheaf of modules along corresponds to the tensor product of modules . In particular,The first vector space is nonzero, with basis the class of . But sends this class to the class of in , which is zero. Thus is the zero map , and is not injective. More explicitly, the pulled-back sequence iswhere exactness fails at its first copy of . Thus is not a left-exact functor:Although is a free module over with one generator, its inclusion into becomes multiplication by after choosing its generator; the tensor product of modules with kills that map. This makes explicit why local freeness of does not preserve this injection under the given pullback.
New to topics? Read the docs here!