 Solution

Choose a basis $x,y$ of the two-dimensional abelian Lie algebra $\mathfrak{a}$, and lifts with the same names. Every alternating bilinear form is determined by $c=\alpha (x,y)$, and every such form is a Lie algebra two-cocycle because every Lie bracket in $\mathfrak{a}$ is zero. Thus every central extension of a Lie algebra has a basis $x,y,z$ withIf $c=0$, all Lie brackets vanish, so this is the direct sum of Lie algebras $\mathfrak{a}\oplus kz\cong k^3$. If $c\ne 0$, replace the central basis vector by $z^{\prime }=cz$. Then $[x,y]=z^{\prime }$, which is the Heisenberg Lie algebra ${\mathfrak{h}}_3(k)$. This change of basis shows that every nonzero $c$ gives the same Lie algebra isomorphism class.

These two Lie algebras cannot be isomorphic: their derived algebras have dimensions zero and one, respectively, and a Lie algebra isomorphism preserves the derived algebra. Moreover, the Heisenberg Lie algebra cannot be a direct sum of Lie algebras $kz\oplus \mathfrak{a}$, since that direct sum of Lie algebras would have zero Lie bracket. ThereforeHere “up to isomorphism” means the Lie algebra isomorphism class of the middle Lie algebra, allowing a change of the identifications at the ends of the short exact sequence. If instead equivalence of central extensions of a Lie algebra must induce the identity on both $kz$ and $\mathfrak{a}$, the parameter $c$ cannot change: the formula in part (a) has $t([x,y])=0$. That stricter notion has one class for each $c\in k$, rather than two. This distinction explains the convention required by the question.