Solution

ID: past-exam-of-the-mathematics-course-of-the-university-of-cambridge/2002/iii/paper-69/3/a/solution

The scaling hypothesis for critical phenomena describes the singular part of the equilibrium free-energy density, rather than its analytic background. For an isotropic system in spatial dimension , with thermal scaling field and conjugate field , write
This follows from coarse graining near a renormalization-group fixed point: a correlation volume is enlarged by , while the relevant thermal and field perturbations grow with their eigenvalues. Choosing gives
The two functions describe the two sides of the transition. Nonuniversal metric factors multiplying must be allowed when comparing microscopic models. Exponents and suitably normalized scaling functions or amplitude ratios characterize a universality class.
Differentiating the free-energy density gives the order parameter , magnetic susceptibility and singular heat capacity proportional to . Thus
The subscript distinguishes the order-parameter exponent from inverse temperature. At , choose to obtain , with . These derivatives imply the Rushbrooke scaling relation and the Widom scaling relation . Equivalently, the equation of state has , with .
The correlation length scales as , . At criticality the connected correlation function behaves as , giving . Integrating over a correlation volume gives and hence the Fisher scaling relation . The hyperscaling relation expresses one singular free-energy contribution per correlation volume.
These laws organize measurements: plotting against collapses near-critical curves onto the appropriate scaling function. A finite system replaces the divergent length by its size ; the corresponding prediction is under the same scaling assumptions. Finite size rounds a sharp thermodynamic singularity.
The hypothesis has a domain of validity. At a renormalization-group fixed point one generally needs , including other scaling fields. Ordinary irrelevant couplings can be set to zero in a nonsingular limiting scaling function. A dangerously irrelevant coupling cannot: above the upper critical dimension of scalar quartic theory, the quartic term is irrelevant at the Gaussian point but still stabilizes the ordered phase. Consequently naive hyperscaling fails there even though other exponent relations can remain valid. Marginal variables can produce logarithms, anisotropic systems require the appropriate volume exponent, and the Berezinskii–Kosterlitz–Thouless transition has an essential correlation-length singularity instead of a finite power-law . Scaling theory relates observables through a small number of fixed-point dimensions; it does not make analytic backgrounds, marginal logarithms or dangerously irrelevant variables disappear.

New to topics? Read the docs here!