Solution
ID: past-exam-of-the-mathematics-course-of-the-university-of-cambridge/2005/iii/paper-29/4/solution
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2005 iii Paper 29 4 Solution by
Codex 0 Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-14
The Gelfond–Schneider theorem says that if is algebraic and is algebraic irrational, every number with is transcendental. Thus the statement includes every determination of the power, not merely a chosen principal branch.
Here is an auxiliary-function outline with the arithmetic and analytic steps specified. Assume were algebraic, and put , . For a large integer , choose degrees and , with constants large enough that . Apply Siegel lemma to imposeon a nonzero polynomial of these two degrees. Each field equation gives at most rational equations. Clearing denominators and bounding conjugates gives equation-coefficient logarithmic size ; the surplus of variables therefore permits coefficient height with
The entire function is nonzero: its polynomial-exponential terms have distinct exponents , and their independence follows by the differential-operator argument in question 2. Here . Its maximum modulus satisfies . The grid points are distinct because is irrational, and lie in a disk of radius .
Suppose the vanishing grid has been extended to , for some . Divide by the product of its known linear zero factors and use the maximum principle on a disk of radius , with large and fixed. At a point of the doubled grid, the quotient estimate givesif the value is nonzero. But this value equals the algebraic number . Clearing its denominators and taking its norm gives the opposite boundFor sufficiently large initial , the terms on the right are uniformly for every : and . Thus every doubled-grid value must be zero. Iterating doubles the grid indefinitely. This supplies quadratically many distinct zeros in disks of linearly growing radius, whereas Jensen's formula and the exponential-polynomial growth bound allow only zeros for a nonzero . The contradiction proves the theorem. This is the Schneider lattice proof of the Gelfond–Schneider theorem.
Now fix any logarithms of algebraic . Their values are nonzero. If were algebraic irrational, then would be algebraic, contradicting the theorem with base . HenceFor arbitrarily many logarithms the qualitative Baker theorem on algebraic linear combinations of logarithms states that logarithms of algebraic numbers which are linearly independent over remain independent over , even after adjoining one to the list. Equivalently a nonzero homogeneous algebraic-coefficient linear combination of such logarithms is transcendental. Rational relations are therefore the only source of homogeneous algebraic relations among the chosen logarithms.
New to topics? Read the docs here!