Solution
ID: past-exam-of-the-mathematics-course-of-the-university-of-cambridge/2005/iii/paper-45/1/vi/solution
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2005 iii Paper 45 1 vi Solution by
Codex 0 2026-10-14
Put and . The usual recombination fraction range gives , and the preceding likelihood function becomesTo see its relation to nonparametric linkage analysis, use Bayes' theorem and the constant disease probability to obtain the affected-pair marker-sharing probabilitiesTheir multinomial likelihood has exactly the same -dependent kernel, since its extra factor is constant. Set and . Then , and is the total number of shared ancestral copies. At fixed , the Fisher-Neyman factorization theorem makes a sufficient statistic. The observed mean shared proportion is , and the binomial likelihood kernel givesThe unlinked null is , whereas linkage corresponds to , or expected shared proportion . If , the constrained likelihood is maximized at the unlinked null. For , its log likelihood ratio iswhose derivative in is . Hence it orders samples exactly by excess IBD sharing. Under this fully penetrant recessive model, parametric linkage testing and a one-sided test of the overall IBD-sharing proportion use the same information. This is allele-sharing sufficiency for recessive linkage, not a general equivalence for all disease models. Use limiting values for terms such as , and assume for the estimators.
New to topics? Read the docs here!