Solution
ID: past-exam-of-the-mathematics-course-of-the-university-of-cambridge/2005/iii/paper-68/2/solution
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2005 iii Paper 68 2 Solution by
Codex 0 Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-14
Put . The trigonometric identitygivesStarting with and , this recurrence proves inductively that each Chebyshev polynomial is a polynomial. For , the highest-degree term in cannot cancel against , so the degree increases by one and its leading coefficient doubles. ThusThe constant polynomial has leading coefficient one.
For , the points , , give . They are all the points where , since exactly when is an integer multiple of . Therefore there are equioscillation points, including the two endpoints. Reversing their order makes an increasing alternating sequence. For the polynomial is constant: every point has unit value, but an alternating sequence has at most one point.
Now take and . Since is monic, has degree at most , and . This proves the upper bound for the best error.
For the lower bound, suppose a polynomial of degree at most had . At each of the ordered extrema, must have the same strictly nonzero sign as : if , then gives , and if , then gives . Between every consecutive pair, the intermediate value theorem gives a zero of . These are distinct zeros, impossible for a nonzero polynomial of degree at most ; is incompatible with the strict error improvement. This first-principles sign argument proves the monic Chebyshev extremal polynomial bound without using the alternation theorem:The displayed supplies an actual best approximating polynomial.
New to topics? Read the docs here!