 Solution

In a unital Banach algebra, the Neumann series gives $(1-u{)}^{-1}={\sum }_{k=0}^{\infty }{u}^k$ whenever $\Vert u\Vert <1$: the series converges in norm by submultiplicativity and completeness, and multiplication of its partial sums on either side gives $1-u^{N+1}\to 1$. Consequently, if $g$ is invertible and $\Vert g^{-1}\Vert \Vert h-g\Vert <1$, writeThe second factor has a Neumann series inverse, so $h$ is invertible. This exhibits a ball around each $g$ in the group of invertible elements of a Banach algebra, proving that group is an open set.

The same series proves continuity of inversion in a Banach algebra, with the useful quantitative estimateThe right side tends to zero as $h\to g$. Since applying inversion twice gives the original element, it is a bijection whose inverse is the same continuous map. Thus inversion is a homeomorphism of the open group of invertibles onto itself.

For the final unheaded request, defineIt is open by the preceding argument and contains $0$. If ${\lambda }_0$ were a boundary point, a sequence ${\lambda }_n\in E$ would converge to ${\lambda }_0$, while openness gives ${\lambda }_0\notin E$. Then $1-{\lambda }_{n}a\to 1-{\lambda }_{0}a$ is a noninvertible limit of invertibles. The one-sided-inverse argument in part (ii) shows that this limit has neither a left inverse of an algebra element nor a right inverse of an algebra element, contradicting the hypothesis. Therefore $E$ has empty boundary; it is both open and closed in the connected complex plane, and $E=\mathbb{C}$.

For every nonzero $\mu$, put $\lambda ={\mu }^{-1}$. The identity $\mu 1-a=\mu (1-\lambda a)$ proves invertibility, so the spectrum of an element $a$ is contained in $\{0\}$. It is nonempty: if the resolvent of an element existed for all $\mu \in \mathbb{C}$, it would be an entire algebra-valued function tending to zero at infinity by the Neumann series. Applying any bounded linear functional and then the Liouville theorem would make it zero; the Hahn-Banach theorem separates points and would force the resolvent itself to be zero, contradicting its inverse equation. Hence