Solution

ID: past-exam-of-the-mathematics-course-of-the-university-of-cambridge/2006/iii/paper-24/1/i/solution

We use the general adjoint functor theorem in its solution-set form. Let be a functor between locally small categories, with a complete category. Then has a left adjoint exactly when it preserves all small categorical limits and, for each , there is a set-indexed family
such that every factors as for some and some . This is the solution-set condition. The indexing family is a set, whereas the entire comma category can be large.
We first prove the initial-object lemma for complete categories with a weakly initial set. Let be locally small and complete, with a weakly initial set . Its product in a category is weakly initial: follow a projection by a map from the corresponding to any desired object. The hom-set is a set, so we can form the simultaneous equalizer
This is a small limit; equivalently, equalize the family of endomorphisms with the family of identity maps into a product of copies of . Every object receives a map from , since it receives one from .
To prove uniqueness, let , and take their equalizer . Weak initiality of gives . Since is an endomorphism of , the defining property of gives
The monomorphism cancels, yielding . Thus is both a monomorphism and a split epimorphism, hence an isomorphism. Its equalizer property now implies . Therefore is initial.
Fix . Small categorical limits in are obtained from the limits in : preservation by supplies the unique map from to the image of the limiting object. The comma category is locally small, and the solution family is a weakly initial set in it. The lemma supplies an initial object .
For , initiality gives a unique arrow satisfying . Uniqueness proves preservation of identities and composition, so is a functor. Initiality also gives natural bijections
which prove .
Conversely, if , the singleton is a solution set by the adjunction bijection. To see that preserves a small limit , use the adjunction and the limit property to obtain, naturally in ,
This is precisely the universal property of the image limit cone. It proves the necessity of both hypotheses.

New to topics? Read the docs here!