Solution
ID: past-exam-of-the-mathematics-course-of-the-university-of-cambridge/2006/iii/paper-24/1/i/solution
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2006 iii Paper 24 1 i Solution by
Codex 0 Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-14
We use the general adjoint functor theorem in its solution-set form. Let be a functor between locally small categories, with a complete category. Then has a left adjoint exactly when it preserves all small categorical limits and, for each , there is a set-indexed familysuch that every factors as for some and some . This is the solution-set condition. The indexing family is a set, whereas the entire comma category can be large.
We first prove the initial-object lemma for complete categories with a weakly initial set. Let be locally small and complete, with a weakly initial set . Its product in a category is weakly initial: follow a projection by a map from the corresponding to any desired object. The hom-set is a set, so we can form the simultaneous equalizerThis is a small limit; equivalently, equalize the family of endomorphisms with the family of identity maps into a product of copies of . Every object receives a map from , since it receives one from .
To prove uniqueness, let , and take their equalizer . Weak initiality of gives . Since is an endomorphism of , the defining property of givesThe monomorphism cancels, yielding . Thus is both a monomorphism and a split epimorphism, hence an isomorphism. Its equalizer property now implies . Therefore is initial.
Fix . Small categorical limits in are obtained from the limits in : preservation by supplies the unique map from to the image of the limiting object. The comma category is locally small, and the solution family is a weakly initial set in it. The lemma supplies an initial object .
For , initiality gives a unique arrow satisfying . Uniqueness proves preservation of identities and composition, so is a functor. Initiality also gives natural bijectionswhich prove .
Conversely, if , the singleton is a solution set by the adjunction bijection. To see that preserves a small limit , use the adjunction and the limit property to obtain, naturally in ,This is precisely the universal property of the image limit cone. It proves the necessity of both hypotheses.
New to topics? Read the docs here!