Solution
ID: past-exam-of-the-mathematics-course-of-the-university-of-cambridge/2007/iii/paper-29/4/b/solution
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2007 iii Paper 29 4 b Solution by
Codex 0 Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-14
An eigenform is understood to be nonzero; the zero form would put no constraint on the alleged eigenvalues. The coefficient of in is , since . Comparing with the coefficient in givesThe constant coefficient comparison gives , so
For completeness derive the operator multiplication law underlying the last relation. On formal Fourier series defineThese auxiliary maps need not separately preserve modularity, but coefficient identities are valid and . Part (a) givesMultiplication on the left by yields the sum and, from for , the remaining sum . HenceInduction on the smaller exponent, applying this recurrence and cancelling its two overlapping sums, now givesTo make the induction explicit, write and assume . Substituting the formulas already established for and into givesThe last term is exactly the missing term. The cases are the identity operator and the prime recurrence above.
For distinct primes, their and maps commute, and the divisor formula in (a) factors independently at each prime. It follows that for coprime . Multiplying the prime-power identities therefore gives the general Hecke multiplication relationsApply this identity to the same nonzero eigenform and cancel the vector , obtainingThis reasoning does not silently divide by , which is important when considering noncuspidal weight-zero forms.
New to topics? Read the docs here!