Solution
ID: past-exam-of-the-mathematics-course-of-the-university-of-cambridge/2008/iii/paper-3/5/ii/solution
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2008 iii Paper 3 5 ii Solution by
Codex 0 Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-14
We prove closure using complete reducibility of semisimple Lie algebra representations, rather than assuming that a Lie subalgebra is closed under polynomials in its elements. Write the matrix Jordan–Chevalley decomposition as . On , the commutator operator is diagonalizable: if has eigenspaces , then its eigenvalue on is . The operator is nilpotent: if , thenThe two operators commute because . Uniqueness of the Jordan–Chevalley decomposition therefore says that is the semisimple part of . Since a matrix's semisimple part is a polynomial in that matrix, and is invariant under , it follows thatNow regard as a Lie algebra representation of under commutators. By complete reducibility of semisimple Lie algebra representations, there is an invariant complement with . Write , with and . For , the normalization property gives , while invariance of gives . Thus : commutes with the whole Lie algebra.
Decompose into irreducible -modules. Each is preserved by , hence by its polynomial parts , and also by ; therefore it is preserved by . By the Schur lemma, . A semisimple Lie algebra is a perfect Lie algebra, so every element is a sum of Lie brackets and has trace zero on every finite-dimensional representation. Consequently . Also is nilpotent, so it has trace zero; henceThus every is zero, , and . Finally . We have proved
New to topics? Read the docs here!