Solution
ID: past-exam-of-the-mathematics-course-of-the-university-of-cambridge/2008/iii/paper-58/3/ii/solution
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2008 iii Paper 58 3 ii Solution by
Codex 0 Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-14
Let be Alice's unknown qubit, with pure state . Alice and Bob initially share the Bell state . Alice holds and Bob holds . Define the Bell basisExpanding in this orthonormal basis gives the Bell-basis teleportation identityFor example, the last branch on is , which is ; the ordering of the Pauli operators therefore matters.
Alice performs a projective measurement in the Bell basis on her two local qubits. Each outcome has probability , independent of the unknown amplitudes. She encodes the four possible outcomes as two classical bits and sends them to Bob. For outcomes , respectively, Bob applies the local unitary operationsThese are inverses of the corresponding branch Pauli operators, so Bob obtains exactly the unknown input qubit in every branch. Using instead of as the last correction also succeeds up to an irrelevant overall phase. Alice need not know or . Every quantum operation is local to one of the parties, and the only transmitted information is the two-bit classical outcome. The shared Bell pair is consumed.
Before the message arrives, Bob's density operator isso no unknown-state information is available without the classical communication. Alice's original qubit has been included in the destructive Bell-basis measurement; the protocol creates no extra copy. Since the corrected transformation is the identity on every input vector and is linear, it also preserves entanglement with an external reference and transfers mixed inputs. Thus this is deterministic quantum teleportation, using precisely one shared maximally entangled Bell pair, two classical bits, and local operations.
New to topics? Read the docs here!