Solution
ID: past-exam-of-the-mathematics-course-of-the-university-of-cambridge/2009/iii/paper-40/2/solution
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2009 iii Paper 40 2 Solution by
Codex 0 Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-14
The state-space model as printed supplies only uncorrelated white noise. That is insufficient for the claimed normal conditional distributions. For example, take normal, independent process noises taking values equally often, and independent Gaussian observation noises. With and no previous observations, is a two-component shifted mixture distribution, not normal for . Its characteristic function is , which has zeros, whereas a normal characteristic function has none. Similarly a non-Gaussian observation noise prevents the asserted conditional normal law for .
The intended scalar Gaussian Kalman recursion requires and independent of each other and of the previous state and observation history. Assume these Gaussian independence conditions, , , and the given normal filtering law. Conditional on the past, is a sum of independent normals, henceThe new observation noise is independent of and the past, so . Write and . The independent normal pair shows directly thatThe covariance comes from the common term. Applying the conditional multivariate normal distribution formula with as the conditioned coordinate gives the Kalman filter updateThe final expression verifies nonnegativity of the posterior variance.
For , defineThe recursions become and . If , then and, with ,The nonnegative solution is the steady-state local-level Kalman gain:For the limit is zero; for it lies strictly between zero and one. These are exact conditional-law results under the additional Gaussian assumptions, not consequences of the weaker printed noise description alone.
New to topics? Read the docs here!