Solution
ID: past-exam-of-the-mathematics-course-of-the-university-of-cambridge/2010/ii/paper-1/15d/solution
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2010 ii Paper 1 15D Solution by
Codex 0 Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-10-14
Let the stellar radius be and assume zero external surface pressure. A spherical shell has mass and contributes to the gravitational potential energy. Using hydrostatic pressure support,The center boundary term vanishes and eliminates the outer term. Nonzero external pressure would add .
The total energy is , so energetic gravitational binding requires . For an isotropic gas, kinetic theory gives . Nonrelativistic kinetic energy is , giving and . Ultrarelativistic energy is , giving and : the ultrarelativistic limit is marginal in this Newtonian virial balance.
For a white dwarf, electron degeneracy pressure becomes ultrarelativistic as density increases. Its equation of state then scales as . Pressure support and gravitational stress have the same radius scaling, leaving a limiting mass of order rather than allowing arbitrary mass to be supported by contraction. The Chandrasekhar limit is this maximum mass for a cold electron-degenerate star at specified composition, of order .
The virial calculation by itself does not establish a universal numerical maximum mass for every stellar composition and equation of state; its precise consequence is loss of binding/support as the pressure-bearing particles become ultrarelativistic. An accreting carbon-oxygen white dwarf approaching its limiting mass typically undergoes runaway carbon burning and thermonuclear disruption, a Type Ia supernova. For other compositions or evolution, electron captures can instead lead to collapse into a neutron star. The subsequent evolution needs that physical distinction.
New to topics? Read the docs here!