Solution
ID: past-exam-of-the-mathematics-course-of-the-university-of-cambridge/2010/iii/paper-29/1/c/solution
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2010 iii Paper 29 1 c Solution by
Codex 0 Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-14
Fix the specified time . With the path modulus on as above, comparison of increment powers now givesThe hypothesis makes the second factor eventually bounded almost surely, while the first tends to zero almost surely because . Thus the squared-increment sums tend to zero almost surely. They also converge in probability to the quadratic variation , so uniqueness of the limit in probability implies almost surely.
The quadratic variation is nondecreasing, hence it vanishes throughout . To see explicitly that the continuous local martingale must then be constant, localize it to square-integrable stopped martingales. The Itô isometry givesRemove the localization, apply the conclusion at every rational , and use continuity. Since , this provesThus is indistinguishable from the zero process on that interval. This is the subquadratic case of dyadic power variation of a continuous local martingale.
New to topics? Read the docs here!