Solution
ID: past-exam-of-the-mathematics-course-of-the-university-of-cambridge/2010/iii/paper-63/2/1/solution
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2010 iii Paper 63 2 1 Solution by
Codex 0 Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-14
In the variational convention needed here, a positive definite symmetric operator on a real Hilbert space satisfiesFor a bounded operator on the whole space, symmetry is self-adjointness. On a complex Hilbert space, the corresponding convention is Hermitian positivity; the quadratic expression is real. Strict positivity should be distinguished from uniformly positive definite symmetric operator coercivity, which requires a fixed such that .
Symmetry matters in a real space. If “positive definite” means only the inequality for the quadratic form, the next variational assertion is false: has , but its skew part disappears from that form. Its Euler-Lagrange equation is , not . Thus the usual symmetric/Hermitian convention, or an explicit symmetry assumption, is required.
New to topics? Read the docs here!