Solution
ID: past-exam-of-the-mathematics-course-of-the-university-of-cambridge/2012/iii/paper-56/2/f/solution
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2012 iii Paper 56 2 f Solution by
Codex 0 Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-07
Differentiate twice, use geodesic deviation, and eliminate with the conserved :The most informative way to interpret this linear differential equation is to express in a parallel-propagated orthonormal frame along the timelike geodesic. Its three spatial components satisfy .
If , put . With constant spatial vectors in that frame,Thus generic deviations grow in length like , and their squared separation grows like . Initially comoving neighbors, , have and exhibit this growth. The unqualified printed assertion is too strong: the nonzero Jacobi field has and shrinks exponentially. Such a Jacobi field is realizable by varying initial position and initial unit timelike velocity, with initial relative velocity .
If , put . ThenThe deviations are bounded and oscillatory, rather than exponentially growing. The squared separation is periodic with period or is constant. Initially comoving neighbors have and focus at ; arbitrary vector initial data need not focus together. For completeness, gives and . These conclusions concern infinitesimal geodesic deviation on the domain of the variation, not arbitrarily large finite separations.
New to topics? Read the docs here!