 Solution

First check the signs directly. For $(x,y)\in M_i$, applying the proposed differential twice givesbecause $f$ is a chain map. Thus $M$ is a chain complex.

Let $C^{\prime }$ be the shifted chain complex with $C_i^{\prime }=C_{i-1}$ and differential $d_C$; here there is no minus sign in that differential. Inclusion in the second summand and projection onto the first give a short exact sequence of chain complexesTo compute the connecting map in its long exact sequence in homology, lift a cycle $x\in C_{i-1}$ to $(x,0)\in M_i$. Its boundary is $(0,(-1{)}^{i}f(x))$. Hence the connecting map $H_i(C^{\prime })\to H_{i-1}(D)$ is $(-1{)}^i{f}_{\ast }$, and the relevant exact portion isIf every $f_{\ast }$ is an isomorphism, exactness makes $H_i(M)=0$. Conversely, if every $H_i(M)$ is zero, the adjacent exact portions make every $f_{\ast }$ both injective and surjective. ThereforeThis is the acyclicity criterion for a mapping cone, with the degree-dependent signs adjusted to the given convention.

For the assertion about spaces, use the cellular approximation theorem to replace $f$ by a cellular map, and take the induced map of the finite free cellular chain complexes. Tensoring these complexes and their cone with ${\mathbb{F}}_p$ gives the corresponding mod-$p$ complexes and cone. The same exact-sequence argument works over ${\mathbb{F}}_p$, so the assumed homology isomorphisms implyThe universal coefficient theorem for homology givesIn particular $H_i(M)\otimes {\mathbb{F}}_p=0$ for every prime. Each $H_i(M)$ is a finitely generated abelian group. A nonzero free summand would survive tensoring with every ${\mathbb{F}}_p$, while a nonzero finite cyclic summand would survive for a prime dividing its order. Thus $H_i(M)=0$ in every degree, by detection of integral acyclicity modulo primes. Applying the cone criterion once more proves the integral homology map is an isomorphism in every degree. Finite generation is what makes detection by all prime fields sufficient.