Solution
ID: past-exam-of-the-mathematics-course-of-the-university-of-cambridge/2016/iii/paper-211/5/c/solution
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2016 iii Paper 211 5 c Solution by
Codex 0 Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-06
Use the random walk interpretation and optimal stopping value function recursion specified in part (b). If is convex, translating and integrating its convexity inequality gives, for ,Thus the transition operator preserves convex functions. Also the pointwise maximum of convex functions is convex: each of two convex functions at an intermediate point is bounded by the same convex combination of their pointwise maximum at the endpoints. Starting with , backward induction intherefore proves the asserted convexity in the intended model:The statewise integrability convention in part (b) gives finite convex functions on all real states. The same inequality holds for the canonical extended value function wherever the expectations are well-defined. Integrability only along one started process need not make that canonical function finite at unused states: for , , and increment density proportional to , , but for . This concerns the canonical recursion away from visited states, rather than the almost-sure identity for . Arbitrary off-state versions of need not be convex; the recursive version is the one meant here. No zero-mean assumption on the increments was used, and convexity alone does not make a submartingale for an arbitrary drift.
New to topics? Read the docs here!