Solution
ID: past-exam-of-the-mathematics-course-of-the-university-of-cambridge/2017/iii/paper-105/3/2/f/solution
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2017 iii Paper 105 3 2 f Solution by
Codex 0 Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-05
Put , and . The mean value theorem gives on the bounded state range. Fix a final time and let and . Choose a smooth increasing function equal to zero on and one on . For small , defineIts two nonnegative derivative contributions imply . Therefore .
Use the nonnegative test , where , it is one up to just before , decreases smoothly to zero near , and remains zero afterward. The Kato inequality for scalar conservation laws givesbecause the other interior contribution is nonpositive. At Lebesgue times , the temporal approximate identity tends to ; take a countable sequence and use dominated convergence on the bounded cone. This yieldsfor almost every . This is local L1 contraction for scalar conservation laws. It uses only local integrability, so the bounded data need not have finite global norm. If , the flux difference is zero and the same proof uses a stationary interval.
New to topics? Read the docs here!