Solution
ID: past-exam-of-the-mathematics-course-of-the-university-of-cambridge/2018/iii/paper-110/3/solution
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2018 iii Paper 110 3 Solution by
Codex 0 Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-05
Statement and definitions. For disjoint nonempty sets of vertices, their edge density of a bipartite graph is . They form a regular pair of vertex sets, or an -uniform pair, ifwhenever , , and .
The Szemerédi regularity lemma states that for every and positive integer , there are integers such that every graph of order has a set partitionwith , , equal nonzero sizes , and at most unordered pairs , , that fail to be -uniform. It is enough to prove this for , since decreasing the parameter strengthens the conclusion.
Energy increment. For the proof, regard each exceptional vertex as a singleton part and use the equitable regularity energyThe sum is over ordered pairs, including diagonal pairs; for those pairs define as the mean adjacency indicator on . Thus . Under a refinement, the subrectangle densities have the original density as their weighted mean. The Cauchy-Schwarz inequality, equivalently the nonnegativity of their weighted variance, gives .
Suppose there are more than irregular pairs, with main cell size . For each such pair choose witnesses , of sizes at least and with . Refine every main cell by all its witness subsets. Each splits into at most atoms, and we may use the larger bound .
For an ordered irregular rectangle, write its refined densities as and relative areas as . The energy gain on that rectangle isThe witness rectangle has relative area at least . Applying the Cauchy-Schwarz inequality to the subrectangles it contains shows that this expression is greater than . There are two orientations of each irregular pair. Since , the total gain is greater than
Restoring equal sizes without losing energy. Put , assuming . Split every refined atom into sets of size , putting its leftover fewer than vertices into the exceptional set as singleton parts. This is a further refinement, so the energy cannot decrease. The number of new exceptional vertices is at mostThe number of new main cells satisfiesFor the first inequality, in each old cell the leftovers have total size less than , so at least one full chunk survives. All previous exceptional singleton parts are kept. Treating leftovers as singleton parts is what makes the energy increment survive equitabilization exactly.
Take and choose so large that . Start with equal main cells, with fewer than exceptional vertices. Define a finite bound by iterating a total of times, starting from . Choose sufficiently large that and whenever .
At each of the first refinements, the exceptional set has size at mostthe cell count is between and , and , so all the chunk sizes above are valid. But unsuccessful refinements would raise by more than , which is impossible. Thus the procedure terminates at a partition satisfying the Szemerédi regularity lemma.
Three linearly large uniform sets. Apply the Szemerédi regularity lemma withFor , delete all edges touching , all internal main-cell edges, all edges of irregular pairs, and all edges of regular pairs whose edge density of a bipartite graph is less than . The respective losses are bounded byThus the total loss is at most , and the remaining graph has at leastedges. Form the reduced graph of a regularity partition , joining two main cells precisely when they are -uniform and have edge density of a bipartite graph at least . If their common size is , the remaining edge count is at most . Since , we obtain . The Mantel theorem gives a triangle in a graph in . Its three cells have the required pairwise density and are -uniform: an -uniform pair is uniform for any larger parameter.
Each selected cell has size . ChooseFor , the Mantel theorem gives a triangle in a graph in the original graph, since its edge count exceeds ; take its three singleton vertices. Their pairs have density one and are uniform for every positive parameter, and . Therefore in all casesThe constant is absolute; the energy proof gives a very large bound for , which does not affect its positivity.
New to topics? Read the docs here!