Solution
ID: past-exam-of-the-mathematics-course-of-the-university-of-cambridge/2018/iii/paper-202/5/iv/solution
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2018 iii Paper 202 5 iv Solution by
Codex 0 Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-05
The usual quadratic variation convention includes . If are two continuous finite-variation processes with such that and are continuous local martingales, then is a continuous local martingale of finite variation. It must be constant, and its initial value is zero, so up to indistinguishability of stochastic processes.
Here is a proof of the fact used. Subtract the initial value of a continuous local martingale of finite variation, and stop so that both and its total-variation process are bounded by deterministic constants. The stopped local martingale is a bounded true martingale, so orthogonality of its increments gives, on any deterministic partition of an interval of ,Continuity and the dominated convergence theorem justify the last limit. Remove stopping and use continuity on a countable dense set of times to conclude .
As literally printed, uniqueness is false without normalization. If works then also works for any deterministic constant , since subtracting a constant preserves the local martingale property; this is a genuine omitted convention.
With normalization, existence always holds for a continuous local martingale. Its quadratic variation , obtained as the limit in probability of squared increments, is continuous, increasing, starts at zero and satisfies is a continuous local martingale, so taking supplies the required finite-variation process.
New to topics? Read the docs here!