Solution

ID: past-exam-of-the-mathematics-course-of-the-university-of-cambridge/2018/iii/paper-202/5/iv/solution

The usual quadratic variation convention includes . If are two continuous finite-variation processes with such that and are continuous local martingales, then is a continuous local martingale of finite variation. It must be constant, and its initial value is zero, so up to indistinguishability of stochastic processes.
Here is a proof of the fact used. Subtract the initial value of a continuous local martingale of finite variation, and stop so that both and its total-variation process are bounded by deterministic constants. The stopped local martingale is a bounded true martingale, so orthogonality of its increments gives, on any deterministic partition of an interval of ,
Continuity and the dominated convergence theorem justify the last limit. Remove stopping and use continuity on a countable dense set of times to conclude .
As literally printed, uniqueness is false without normalization. If works then also works for any deterministic constant , since subtracting a constant preserves the local martingale property; this is a genuine omitted convention.
With normalization, existence always holds for a continuous local martingale. Its quadratic variation , obtained as the limit in probability of squared increments, is continuous, increasing, starts at zero and satisfies is a continuous local martingale, so taking supplies the required finite-variation process.

New to topics? Read the docs here!