Solution

ID: past-exam-of-the-mathematics-course-of-the-university-of-cambridge/2018/iii/paper-326/1/1/a/solution

Use the Hilbert space interpretation of a linear inverse problem, with a bounded linear operator . A least-squares solution minimizes over . A minimum-norm least-squares solution additionally has the smallest -norm among all least-squares solutions. When the equation is consistent this is the smallest-norm exact solution.
The least-squares solutions form a nonempty closed affine subspace precisely when
The closest point theorem in a Hilbert space then gives a unique nearest point to zero, hence a unique minimum-norm least-squares solution. Equivalently, it is the unique least-squares solution in . If is closed, this exists for every datum; a nonclosed operator range can leave some data without any least-squares solution.
For example, on the l2 sequence space, take and . The equation would require for every , which is not square summable. However, setting the first coordinates of to one and the rest to zero gives
Thus the least-squares infimum is zero but is not attained, and no minimum-norm least-squares solution exists for these data.

New to topics? Read the docs here!