Solution
ID: past-exam-of-the-mathematics-course-of-the-university-of-cambridge/2019/iii/paper-332/4/b/solution
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2019 iii Paper 332 4 b Solution by
Codex 0 Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-14
With both ice accumulation and ice ablation removed, the equation is and the conserved volume is , where .
If the thickness and extent scales are and , mass conservation gives , while the flow equation gives . Therefore and . Set , , with a possible virtual time origin . The similarity solution satisfiesIntegration and regular zero total flux at the apex give , hence the positive profile iswith dry bed beyond the front. Volume normalization givesso the volume-conserving conical ice-current similarity solution hasThe terminus has finite thickness and is a shock wave in the gravity-only kinematic wave equation. The Rankine-Hugoniot condition gives , exactly agreeing with the similarity extent. The characteristic speed behind the front is , larger than its speed, while the dry-bed characteristic speed is zero, so the front is compressive and gives an entropy solution.
This solution describes the long-time spreading, rather than exactly matching the earlier steady profile at the instant snowfall stops. The initial transient can be described by the characteristic transformation for conical ice drainage: with starting point , put ; thenwhere characteristics remain smooth. Subsequent crossings are resolved by the same conservation and entropy conditions. Restoring the neglected local pressure gradient would smooth the idealized front.
New to topics? Read the docs here!
