Solution

ID: past-exam-of-the-mathematics-course-of-the-university-of-cambridge/2023/iii/paper-142/1/solution

Let be the projectivization of a real vector bundle, let be its tautological bundle, and put
The mod-two projective bundle formula says that is a free -module on . The Projective bundle definition of Stiefel–Whitney classes is the unique relation
Apply the splitting principle for real vector bundles. After an injective pullback, write
If , the projective-bundle relation factors as
so
The line summands of are the union of the two lists, hence
Comparing the degree- components proves the Whitney product formula for Stiefel–Whitney classes
Injectivity of the splitting pullback returns the identity to .
For real line bundles, the transition functions take values in . Tensor product multiplies these signs, while the identification turns multiplication into addition. The corresponding degree-one characteristic classes therefore satisfy the First Stiefel–Whitney class of a tensor product of real line bundles formula
Equivalently, this follows from the classification of real line bundles by .
Now take and . Since
a line in is the fixed line tensored with a line in . Thus the projectivization of copies of the real tautological line bundle is
Let and be the degree-one generators pulled back from the first and second factors. The mod-two cohomology ring of real projective space and the Künneth theorem give
The tautological line is the tensor product of the two tautological lines, so . In the alternative generator , the same ring is
The stable tangent-bundle identity
gives
For the vertical part of the tangent bundle of a projectivized real vector bundle,
Each of the line summands on the right has first Stiefel–Whitney class
The Whitney product formula for Stiefel–Whitney classes therefore yields
the Total Stiefel–Whitney class of the projectivization of copies of the tautological line.

New to topics? Read the docs here!